Who is working on and doing this "reseach project"?We are a group of researchers from University of California, Riverside (we introduced ourselves in an earlier email to security@xxxxxxxxxx if you recall). Please allow us to articulate the goal of our research. We'd be happy to hear your feedback and suggestions.
And what is itFrom our limited understanding, we know a key problem with syzbot bugs is that there are too many of them - more than what can be handled by developers and maintainers. Therefore, it seems some form of prioritization on bug fixing would be helpful. The goal of the SyzScope project is to *automatically* analyze the security impact of syzbot bugs, which helps with prioritizing bug fixes. In other words, when a syzbot bug is reported, we aim to attach a corresponding security impact "signal" to help developers make an informed decision on which ones to fix first.
doing to actually fix the issues that syzbot finds? Seems like that
would be a better solution instead of just trying to send emails saying,
in short "why isn't this reported issue fixed yet?"
On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 02:50:03PM -0700, ETenal wrote:
Hi,Who is working on and doing this "reseach project"? And what is it
This is SyzScope, a research project that aims to reveal high-risk
primitives from a seemingly low-risk bug (UAF/OOB read, WARNING, BUG, etc.).
doing to actually fix the issues that syzbot finds? Seems like that
would be a better solution instead of just trying to send emails saying,
in short "why isn't this reported issue fixed yet?"
thanks,
greg k-h