Re: [PATCH 13/34] docs: dev-tools: testing-overview.rst: avoid using ReSt :doc:`foo` markup

[Mauro Carvalho Chehab]

Em Sat, 5 Jun 2021 23:43:55 +0800
David Gow <davidgow@xxxxxxxxxx> escreveu:

> On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 9:18 PM Mauro Carvalho Chehab
> <mchehab+huawei@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > The :doc:`foo` tag is auto-generated via automarkup.py.
> > So, use the filename at the sources, instead of :doc:`foo`.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---  
> 
> Hmm... I'd originally wanted this to read more like the name of the
> tool than the path to the doc file, but given the :doc: prefix and
> backticks are equally ugly, and no less confusing to the plain-text
> reader than the filename, I'm happy to have this changed. Particularly
> if we're standardising on this across the kernel documentation.

Yeah, the idea is to avoid :doc: treewide, at least for simple cases.

I'm proposing that we should still keep using:

	:doc:`some description <foo>`

for named references, which is still ugly in plain-text, but can be
used to provide a better hyperlink when the docs are converted
into html/LaTeX/pdf, as it would be converted (in html) as:

	<a href="foo.html">some description</a>

> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks!
Mauro

> 
> 
> -- David
> 
> >  Documentation/dev-tools/testing-overview.rst | 16 ++++++++--------
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/testing-overview.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/testing-overview.rst
> > index b5b46709969c..65feb81edb14 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/testing-overview.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/testing-overview.rst
> > @@ -71,15 +71,15 @@ can be used to verify that a test is executing particular functions or lines
> >  of code. This is useful for determining how much of the kernel is being tested,
> >  and for finding corner-cases which are not covered by the appropriate test.
> >
> > -:doc:`gcov` is GCC's coverage testing tool, which can be used with the kernel
> > -to get global or per-module coverage. Unlike KCOV, it does not record per-task
> > -coverage. Coverage data can be read from debugfs, and interpreted using the
> > -usual gcov tooling.
> > +Documentation/dev-tools/gcov.rst is GCC's coverage testing tool, which can be
> > +used with the kernel to get global or per-module coverage. Unlike KCOV, it
> > +does not record per-task coverage. Coverage data can be read from debugfs,
> > +and interpreted using the usual gcov tooling.
> >
> > -:doc:`kcov` is a feature which can be built in to the kernel to allow
> > -capturing coverage on a per-task level. It's therefore useful for fuzzing and
> > -other situations where information about code executed during, for example, a
> > -single syscall is useful.
> > +Documentation/dev-tools/kcov.rst is a feature which can be built in to the
> > +kernel to allow capturing coverage on a per-task level. It's therefore useful
> > +for fuzzing and other situations where information about code executed during,
> > +for example, a single syscall is useful.
> >
> >
> >  Dynamic Analysis Tools
> > --
> > 2.31.1
> >  



Thanks,
Mauro