On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 05:54:45PM +0800, huangguangbin (A) wrote:Ok, thanks. We will modify this according to your idea, and repost a new version after we test ok.
This won't work. After all, the ISR thread might already be running.Thanks for review. Using spinlock in irq_handler looks heavy, what about
Use a proper spinlock instead.
adding a new flag HCLGE_STATE_PTP_CLEANING_TX_HWTS for hclge_ptp_clean_tx_hwts()?
Function hclge_ptp_clean_tx_hwts() test and set this flag at the beginning
and clean it in the end. Do you think it is Ok?
No, I don't. Use a proper lock. Don't make vague arguments about how
it "looks heavy".
Thanks,
Richard
.