Re: [PATCH 1/4] pwm: core: Support new usage_power setting in PWM state
From: Uwe Kleine-König
Date: Mon Jun 07 2021 - 02:08:43 EST
Hello Thierry,
On Fri, Jun 04, 2021 at 11:49:37AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> In the interest of making forward progress, I've applied this series.
I proposed a different approach that in contrast to usage_power:
- is well defined
(so driver authors and consumers know what to provide or expect resp.);
- has good name people understand without reading documentation;
- fully covers the problem Clemens want to address;
- fully covers what the only implementing lowlevel driver does; and
- is easy to implement based on the patches in this series
This is not what I call "forward progress". I take it personal that
after I pointed out technical shortcomings with this patch set and even
suggested a better concept, you didn't even made the effort to argue
but instead simply went on applying the patches.
Can you please point out what I'm missing?
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature