Re: [PATCH 1/1] lib/test: Fix spelling mistakes

From: Leizhen (ThunderTown)
Date: Mon Jun 07 2021 - 05:19:08 EST




On 2021/6/7 17:06, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 11:56 AM Leizhen (ThunderTown)
> <thunder.leizhen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 2021/6/7 16:52, Leizhen (ThunderTown) wrote:
>>> On 2021/6/7 16:39, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 6:21 AM Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Fix some spelling mistakes in comments:
>>>>> thats ==> that's
>>>>> unitialized ==> uninitialized
>>>>> panicing ==> panicking
>>>>> sucess ==> success
>>>>> possitive ==> positive
>>>>> intepreted ==> interpreted
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the fix! Is it done with the help of the codespell tool? If
>>>> not, can you run it and check if it suggests more fixes?
>>>
>>> Yes, it's detected by codespell tool. But to avoid too many changes in one patch, I tried
>>> breaking it down into smaller patches(If it can be classified) to make it easier to review.
>>> In fact, the other patch I just posted included the rest.
>>
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/6/7/151
>>
>> All the remaining spelling mistakes are fixed by the patch above. I can combine the two of
>> them into one patch if you think it's necessary.
>
> No, it's good to keep them split. What I meant is to use the tool
> against the same subset of the files you have done your patch for. But
> please mention in the commit message that you have used that tool, so
> reviewers will not waste time on the comments like mine.

Okay, thanks for the advice.

>
>