Re: [PATCH v4 4/7] gpio: gpio-aspeed-sgpio: Add AST2600 sgpio support

From: Steven Lee
Date: Mon Jun 07 2021 - 22:50:48 EST

Next message: Hu Haowen: "Re: [PATCH] docs/zh_CN: add a translation for index"
Previous message: Seth David Schoen: "Re: [PATCH] net: appletalk: fix some mistakes in grammar"
In reply to: Andrew Jeffery: "Re: [PATCH v4 4/7] gpio: gpio-aspeed-sgpio: Add AST2600 sgpio support"
Next in thread: Andrew Jeffery: "Re: [PATCH v4 4/7] gpio: gpio-aspeed-sgpio: Add AST2600 sgpio support"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

The 06/08/2021 07:43, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 7 Jun 2021, at 16:45, Steven Lee wrote:
> > AST2600 SoC has 2 SGPIO master interfaces one with 128 pins another one
> > with 80 pins.
> > In the current driver, the maximum number of gpio pins of SoC is hardcoded
> > as 80 and the gpio pin count mask for GPIO Configuration register is
> > hardcode as GENMASK(9,6). In addition, some functions use the hardcoded
> > value to calculate the gpio offset.
> > The patch adds ast2600 compatibles and platform data that includes the
> > max number of gpio pins supported by ast2600 and gpio pin count mask for
> > GPIO Configuration register.
> > The patch also modifies some functions to pass aspeed_sgpio struct for
> > calculating gpio offset without using the hardcoded value.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Steven Lee <steven_lee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpio/gpio-aspeed-sgpio.c | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++----------
> > 1 file changed, 76 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-aspeed-sgpio.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-aspeed-sgpio.c
> > index 64e54f8c30d2..8b893356f0ca 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-aspeed-sgpio.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-aspeed-sgpio.c
> > @@ -35,12 +35,18 @@
> > #define ASPEED_SGPIO_CLK_DIV_MASK GENMASK(31, 16)
> > #define ASPEED_SGPIO_ENABLE BIT(0)
> >
> > +struct aspeed_sgpio_pdata {
> > + const u32 pin_mask;
> > + int max_ngpios;
> > +};
> > +
> > struct aspeed_sgpio {
> > struct gpio_chip chip;
> > struct clk *pclk;
> > spinlock_t lock;
> > void __iomem *base;
> > int irq;
> > + int max_ngpios;
> > int n_sgpio;
> > };
> >
> > @@ -75,7 +81,13 @@ static const struct aspeed_sgpio_bank
> > aspeed_sgpio_banks[] = {
> > .val_regs = 0x0038,
> > .rdata_reg = 0x0078,
> > .irq_regs = 0x003C,
> > - .names = { "I", "J" },
> > + .names = { "I", "J", "K", "L" },
> > + },
> > + {
> > + .val_regs = 0x0090,
> > + .rdata_reg = 0x007C,
> > + .irq_regs = 0x0094,
> > + .names = { "M", "N", "O", "P" },
> > },
> > };
> >
> > @@ -121,15 +133,15 @@ static void __iomem *bank_reg(struct aspeed_sgpio *gpio,
> > }
> > }
> >
> > -#define GPIO_BANK(x) ((x % SGPIO_OUTPUT_OFFSET) >> 5)
> > -#define GPIO_OFFSET(x) ((x % SGPIO_OUTPUT_OFFSET) & 0x1f)
> > -#define GPIO_BIT(x) BIT(GPIO_OFFSET(x))
> > +#define GPIO_BANK(x, gpio) ((x % (gpio)->max_ngpios) >> 5)
>
> I couldn't stop myself from commenting on this: The 'context' parameter should be first (by convention), so:
>
> #define GPIO_BANK(gpio, x) ((x % (gpio)->max_ngpios) >> 5)
>
> There's another fix necessary here too - the x needs to be parenthesised:
>
> #define GPIO_BANK(gpio, x) (((x) % (gpio)->max_ngpios) >> 5)
>
> > +#define GPIO_OFFSET(x) ((x) & GENMASK(4, 0))
> > +#define GPIO_BIT(x, gpio) BIT(GPIO_OFFSET(x % (gpio)->max_ngpios))
>
> Again, put the context parameter first. And again we should add the parentheses around x in the expression.
>
> >
> > -static const struct aspeed_sgpio_bank *to_bank(unsigned int offset)
> > +static const struct aspeed_sgpio_bank *to_bank(unsigned int offset,
> > const struct aspeed_sgpio *gpio)
> > {
> > unsigned int bank;
> >
> > - bank = GPIO_BANK(offset);
> > + bank = GPIO_BANK(offset, gpio);
> >
> > WARN_ON(bank >= ARRAY_SIZE(aspeed_sgpio_banks));
> > return &aspeed_sgpio_banks[bank];
> > @@ -139,18 +151,19 @@ static int aspeed_sgpio_init_valid_mask(struct
> > gpio_chip *gc,
> > unsigned long *valid_mask, unsigned int ngpios)
> > {
> > struct aspeed_sgpio *sgpio = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
> > + int max_ngpios = sgpio->max_ngpios;
> > int n = sgpio->n_sgpio;
> > - int c = SGPIO_OUTPUT_OFFSET - n;
> > + int c = max_ngpios - n;
> >
> > - WARN_ON(ngpios < MAX_NR_HW_SGPIO * 2);
> > + WARN_ON(ngpios < max_ngpios * 2);
> >
> > /* input GPIOs in the lower range */
> > bitmap_set(valid_mask, 0, n);
> > bitmap_clear(valid_mask, n, c);
> >
> > - /* output GPIOS above SGPIO_OUTPUT_OFFSET */
> > - bitmap_set(valid_mask, SGPIO_OUTPUT_OFFSET, n);
> > - bitmap_clear(valid_mask, SGPIO_OUTPUT_OFFSET + n, c);
> > + /* output GPIOS above max_ngpios */
> > + bitmap_set(valid_mask, max_ngpios, n);
> > + bitmap_clear(valid_mask, max_ngpios + n, c);
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
> > @@ -161,30 +174,30 @@ static void
> > aspeed_sgpio_irq_init_valid_mask(struct gpio_chip *gc,
> > struct aspeed_sgpio *sgpio = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
> > int n = sgpio->n_sgpio;
> >
> > - WARN_ON(ngpios < MAX_NR_HW_SGPIO * 2);
> > + WARN_ON(ngpios < sgpio->max_ngpios * 2);
> >
> > /* input GPIOs in the lower range */
> > bitmap_set(valid_mask, 0, n);
> > bitmap_clear(valid_mask, n, ngpios - n);
> > }
> >
> > -static bool aspeed_sgpio_is_input(unsigned int offset)
> > +static bool aspeed_sgpio_is_input(unsigned int offset, const struct
> > aspeed_sgpio *gpio)
> > {
> > - return offset < SGPIO_OUTPUT_OFFSET;
> > + return offset < gpio->max_ngpios;
> > }
> >
> > static int aspeed_sgpio_get(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset)
> > {
> > struct aspeed_sgpio *gpio = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
> > - const struct aspeed_sgpio_bank *bank = to_bank(offset);
> > + const struct aspeed_sgpio_bank *bank = to_bank(offset, gpio);
> > unsigned long flags;
> > enum aspeed_sgpio_reg reg;
> > int rc = 0;
> >
> > spin_lock_irqsave(&gpio->lock, flags);
> >
> > - reg = aspeed_sgpio_is_input(offset) ? reg_val : reg_rdata;
> > - rc = !!(ioread32(bank_reg(gpio, bank, reg)) & GPIO_BIT(offset));
> > + reg = aspeed_sgpio_is_input(offset, gpio) ? reg_val : reg_rdata;
> > + rc = !!(ioread32(bank_reg(gpio, bank, reg)) & GPIO_BIT(offset, gpio));
> >
> > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gpio->lock, flags);
> >
> > @@ -194,11 +207,11 @@ static int aspeed_sgpio_get(struct gpio_chip *gc,
> > unsigned int offset)
> > static int sgpio_set_value(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset,
> > int val)
> > {
> > struct aspeed_sgpio *gpio = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
> > - const struct aspeed_sgpio_bank *bank = to_bank(offset);
> > + const struct aspeed_sgpio_bank *bank = to_bank(offset, gpio);
> > void __iomem *addr_r, *addr_w;
> > u32 reg = 0;
> >
> > - if (aspeed_sgpio_is_input(offset))
> > + if (aspeed_sgpio_is_input(offset, gpio))
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > /* Since this is an output, read the cached value from rdata, then
> > @@ -209,9 +222,9 @@ static int sgpio_set_value(struct gpio_chip *gc,
> > unsigned int offset, int val)
> > reg = ioread32(addr_r);
> >
> > if (val)
> > - reg |= GPIO_BIT(offset);
> > + reg |= GPIO_BIT(offset, gpio);
> > else
> > - reg &= ~GPIO_BIT(offset);
> > + reg &= ~GPIO_BIT(offset, gpio);
> >
> > iowrite32(reg, addr_w);
> >
> > @@ -232,7 +245,9 @@ static void aspeed_sgpio_set(struct gpio_chip *gc,
> > unsigned int offset, int val)
> >
> > static int aspeed_sgpio_dir_in(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset)
> > {
> > - return aspeed_sgpio_is_input(offset) ? 0 : -EINVAL;
> > + struct aspeed_sgpio *gpio = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
> > +
> > + return aspeed_sgpio_is_input(offset, gpio) ? 0 : -EINVAL;
> > }
> >
> > static int aspeed_sgpio_dir_out(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int
> > offset, int val)
> > @@ -253,7 +268,9 @@ static int aspeed_sgpio_dir_out(struct gpio_chip
> > *gc, unsigned int offset, int v
> >
> > static int aspeed_sgpio_get_direction(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned
> > int offset)
> > {
> > - return !!aspeed_sgpio_is_input(offset);
> > + struct aspeed_sgpio *gpio = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
> > +
> > + return !!aspeed_sgpio_is_input(offset, gpio);
> > }
> >
> > static void irqd_to_aspeed_sgpio_data(struct irq_data *d,
> > @@ -268,8 +285,8 @@ static void irqd_to_aspeed_sgpio_data(struct irq_data *d,
> > WARN_ON(!internal);
> >
> > *gpio = internal;
> > - *bank = to_bank(*offset);
> > - *bit = GPIO_BIT(*offset);
> > + *bank = to_bank(*offset, internal);
> > + *bit = GPIO_BIT(*offset, internal);
> > }
> >
> > static void aspeed_sgpio_irq_ack(struct irq_data *d)
> > @@ -466,9 +483,21 @@ static int aspeed_sgpio_setup_irqs(struct
> > aspeed_sgpio *gpio,
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +static const struct aspeed_sgpio_pdata ast2600_sgpiom_128_pdata = {
> > + .max_ngpios = 128,
> > + .pin_mask = GENMASK(10, 6),
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct aspeed_sgpio_pdata ast2600_sgpiom_80_pdata = {
> > + .max_ngpios = 80,
> > + .pin_mask = GENMASK(10, 6),
> > +};
> > +
> > static const struct of_device_id aspeed_sgpio_of_table[] = {
> > { .compatible = "aspeed,ast2400-sgpio" },
> > { .compatible = "aspeed,ast2500-sgpio" },
>
> Add .data for these too.
>

I was wondering if I can define a platform data for both ast2400 and
ast2500 as they have the same configurations.

For example:

static const struct aspeed_sgpio_pdata ast2400_sgpio_pdata = {
.max_ngpios = 80,
.pin_mask = GENMASK(9, 6),
};

static const struct of_device_id aspeed_sgpio_of_table[] = {
{ .compatible = "aspeed,ast2400-sgpio", .data = ast2400_sgpio_pdata, },
{ .compatible = "aspeed,ast2500-sgpio", .data = ast2400_sgpio_pdata, },

Thanks,
Steven

> > + { .compatible = "aspeed,ast2600-sgpiom-128", .data =
> > &ast2600_sgpiom_128_pdata, },
> > + { .compatible = "aspeed,ast2600-sgpiom-80", .data =
> > &ast2600_sgpiom_80_pdata, },
> > {}
> > };
> >
> > @@ -476,10 +505,11 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, aspeed_sgpio_of_table);
> >
> > static int __init aspeed_sgpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > {
> > + u32 nr_gpios, sgpio_freq, sgpio_clk_div, gpio_cnt_regval, pin_mask;
> > + const struct aspeed_sgpio_pdata *pdata;
> > struct aspeed_sgpio *gpio;
> > - u32 nr_gpios, sgpio_freq, sgpio_clk_div;
> > - int rc;
> > unsigned long apb_freq;
> > + int rc;
> >
> > gpio = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*gpio), GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (!gpio)
> > @@ -489,13 +519,26 @@ static int __init aspeed_sgpio_probe(struct
> > platform_device *pdev)
> > if (IS_ERR(gpio->base))
> > return PTR_ERR(gpio->base);
> >
> > + pdata = device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
> > + if (pdata) {
> > + gpio->max_ngpios = pdata->max_ngpios;
> > + pin_mask = pdata->pin_mask;
> > + } else {
> > + gpio->max_ngpios = MAX_NR_HW_SGPIO;
> > + pin_mask = ASPEED_SGPIO_PINS_MASK;
>
> Given the refactor I think the MAX_NR_HW_SGPIO and ASPEED_SGPIO_PINS_MASK macros are confusing and should be dropped.
>
> Further, I think it would be better to just define these 'default' values in .data for the 2400 and 2500 compatibles and drop this if/else entirely.
>
> > + }
> > +
> > rc = of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node, "ngpios", &nr_gpios);
> > if (rc < 0) {
> > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Could not read ngpios property\n");
> > return -EINVAL;
> > - } else if (nr_gpios > MAX_NR_HW_SGPIO) {
> > + } else if (nr_gpios % 8) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Number of GPIOs not multiple of 8: %d\n",
> > + nr_gpios);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + } else if (nr_gpios > gpio->max_ngpios) {
>
> I'd prefer this in a separate patch.
>
> > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Number of GPIOs exceeds the maximum of %d:
> > %d\n",
> > - MAX_NR_HW_SGPIO, nr_gpios);
> > + gpio->max_ngpios, nr_gpios);
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> > gpio->n_sgpio = nr_gpios;
> > @@ -531,15 +574,14 @@ static int __init aspeed_sgpio_probe(struct
> > platform_device *pdev)
> > if (sgpio_clk_div > (1 << 16) - 1)
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > - iowrite32(FIELD_PREP(ASPEED_SGPIO_CLK_DIV_MASK, sgpio_clk_div) |
> > - FIELD_PREP(ASPEED_SGPIO_PINS_MASK, (nr_gpios / 8)) |
> > - ASPEED_SGPIO_ENABLE,
> > - gpio->base + ASPEED_SGPIO_CTRL);
> > + gpio_cnt_regval = ((nr_gpios / 8) << 6) & pin_mask;
>
> Add a #define for the field starting at bit 6.
>
> Andrew

Next message: Hu Haowen: "Re: [PATCH] docs/zh_CN: add a translation for index"
Previous message: Seth David Schoen: "Re: [PATCH] net: appletalk: fix some mistakes in grammar"
In reply to: Andrew Jeffery: "Re: [PATCH v4 4/7] gpio: gpio-aspeed-sgpio: Add AST2600 sgpio support"
Next in thread: Andrew Jeffery: "Re: [PATCH v4 4/7] gpio: gpio-aspeed-sgpio: Add AST2600 sgpio support"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]