Re: [PATCH 5/9] mm: remove CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM

[David Hildenbrand]

On 02.06.21 12:53, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> There are no architectures that support DISCONTIGMEM left.
>
> Remove the configuration option and the dead code it was guarding in the
> generic memory management code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>   include/asm-generic/memory_model.h | 37 ++++--------------------------
>   include/linux/mmzone.h             |  4 ++--
>   mm/Kconfig                         | 25 +++-----------------
>   mm/memory.c                        |  3 +--
>   mm/page_alloc.c                    | 13 -----------
>   5 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/memory_model.h b/include/asm-generic/memory_model.h
> index 7637fb46ba4f..a2c8ed60233a 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/memory_model.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/memory_model.h
> @@ -6,47 +6,18 @@
>   
>   #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>   
> +/*
> + * supports 3 memory models.
> + */
>   #if defined(CONFIG_FLATMEM)
>   
>   #ifndef ARCH_PFN_OFFSET
>   #define ARCH_PFN_OFFSET		(0UL)
>   #endif
>   
> -#elif defined(CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM)
> -
> -#ifndef arch_pfn_to_nid
> -#define arch_pfn_to_nid(pfn)	pfn_to_nid(pfn)
> -#endif
> -
> -#ifndef arch_local_page_offset
> -#define arch_local_page_offset(pfn, nid)	\
> -	((pfn) - NODE_DATA(nid)->node_start_pfn)
> -#endif
> -
> -#endif /* CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM */
> -
> -/*
> - * supports 3 memory models.
> - */
> -#if defined(CONFIG_FLATMEM)
> -
>   #define __pfn_to_page(pfn)	(mem_map + ((pfn) - ARCH_PFN_OFFSET))
>   #define __page_to_pfn(page)	((unsigned long)((page) - mem_map) + \
>   				 ARCH_PFN_OFFSET)
> -#elif defined(CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM)
> -
> -#define __pfn_to_page(pfn)			\
> -({	unsigned long __pfn = (pfn);		\
> -	unsigned long __nid = arch_pfn_to_nid(__pfn);  \
> -	NODE_DATA(__nid)->node_mem_map + arch_local_page_offset(__pfn, __nid);\
> -})
> -
> -#define __page_to_pfn(pg)						\
> -({	const struct page *__pg = (pg);					\
> -	struct pglist_data *__pgdat = NODE_DATA(page_to_nid(__pg));	\
> -	(unsigned long)(__pg - __pgdat->node_mem_map) +			\
> -	 __pgdat->node_start_pfn;					\
> -})
>   
>   #elif defined(CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP)
>   
> @@ -70,7 +41,7 @@
>   	struct mem_section *__sec = __pfn_to_section(__pfn);	\
>   	__section_mem_map_addr(__sec) + __pfn;		\
>   })
> -#endif /* CONFIG_FLATMEM/DISCONTIGMEM/SPARSEMEM */
> +#endif /* CONFIG_FLATMEM/SPARSEMEM */
>   
>   /*
>    * Convert a physical address to a Page Frame Number and back
> diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> index 0d53eba1c383..2b41e252a995 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> @@ -738,8 +738,8 @@ struct zonelist {
>   	struct zoneref _zonerefs[MAX_ZONES_PER_ZONELIST + 1];
>   };
>   
> -#ifndef CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM
> -/* The array of struct pages - for discontigmem use pgdat->lmem_map */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_FLATMEM
> +/* The array of struct pages for flatmem */
>   extern struct page *mem_map;
>   #endif
>   
> diff --git a/mm/Kconfig b/mm/Kconfig
> index 02d44e3420f5..218b96ccc84a 100644
> --- a/mm/Kconfig
> +++ b/mm/Kconfig
> @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ choice
>   
>   config FLATMEM_MANUAL
>   	bool "Flat Memory"
> -	depends on !(ARCH_DISCONTIGMEM_ENABLE || ARCH_SPARSEMEM_ENABLE) || ARCH_FLATMEM_ENABLE
> +	depends on !ARCH_SPARSEMEM_ENABLE || ARCH_FLATMEM_ENABLE
>   	help
>   	  This option is best suited for non-NUMA systems with
>   	  flat address space. The FLATMEM is the most efficient
> @@ -32,21 +32,6 @@ config FLATMEM_MANUAL
>   
>   	  If unsure, choose this option (Flat Memory) over any other.
>   
> -config DISCONTIGMEM_MANUAL
> -	bool "Discontiguous Memory"
> -	depends on ARCH_DISCONTIGMEM_ENABLE
> -	help
> -	  This option provides enhanced support for discontiguous
> -	  memory systems, over FLATMEM.  These systems have holes
> -	  in their physical address spaces, and this option provides
> -	  more efficient handling of these holes.
> -
> -	  Although "Discontiguous Memory" is still used by several
> -	  architectures, it is considered deprecated in favor of
> -	  "Sparse Memory".
> -
> -	  If unsure, choose "Sparse Memory" over this option.
> -
>   config SPARSEMEM_MANUAL
>   	bool "Sparse Memory"
>   	depends on ARCH_SPARSEMEM_ENABLE
> @@ -62,17 +47,13 @@ config SPARSEMEM_MANUAL
>   
>   endchoice
>   
> -config DISCONTIGMEM
> -	def_bool y
> -	depends on (!SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL && ARCH_DISCONTIGMEM_ENABLE) || DISCONTIGMEM_MANUAL
> -
>   config SPARSEMEM
>   	def_bool y
>   	depends on (!SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL && ARCH_SPARSEMEM_ENABLE) || SPARSEMEM_MANUAL
>   
>   config FLATMEM
>   	def_bool y
> -	depends on (!DISCONTIGMEM && !SPARSEMEM) || FLATMEM_MANUAL
> +	depends on !SPARSEMEM || FLATMEM_MANUAL
>   
>   config FLAT_NODE_MEM_MAP
>   	def_bool y
> @@ -85,7 +66,7 @@ config FLAT_NODE_MEM_MAP
>   #
>   config NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES
>   	def_bool y
> -	depends on DISCONTIGMEM || NUMA
> +	depends on NUMA
>   
>   #
>   # SPARSEMEM_EXTREME (which is the default) does some bootmem
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index 730daa00952b..7c7b6ea02504 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -90,8 +90,7 @@
>   #warning Unfortunate NUMA and NUMA Balancing config, growing page-frame for last_cpupid.
>   #endif
>   
> -#ifndef CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES
> -/* use the per-pgdat data instead for discontigmem - mbligh */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_FLATMEM
>   unsigned long max_mapnr;
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL(max_mapnr);
>   
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index aaa1655cf682..6fc22482eaa8 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -331,20 +331,7 @@ compound_page_dtor * const compound_page_dtors[NR_COMPOUND_DTORS] = {
>   
>   int min_free_kbytes = 1024;
>   int user_min_free_kbytes = -1;
> -#ifdef CONFIG_DISCONTIGMEM
> -/*
> - * DiscontigMem defines memory ranges as separate pg_data_t even if the ranges
> - * are not on separate NUMA nodes. Functionally this works but with
> - * watermark_boost_factor, it can reclaim prematurely as the ranges can be
> - * quite small. By default, do not boost watermarks on discontigmem as in
> - * many cases very high-order allocations like THP are likely to be
> - * unsupported and the premature reclaim offsets the advantage of long-term
> - * fragmentation avoidance.
> - */
> -int watermark_boost_factor __read_mostly;
> -#else
>   int watermark_boost_factor __read_mostly = 15000;
> -#endif
>   int watermark_scale_factor = 10;
>   
>   static unsigned long nr_kernel_pages __initdata;

Nice

Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>

--
Thanks,

David / dhildenb