Re: [PATCH 2/2] soc: mediatek: pwrap: add pwrap driver for MT8195 SoC

[James Lo]

On Wed, 2021-06-09 at 10:06 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> 
> On 09/06/2021 09:51, Fei Shao wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 7:21 PM James Lo <james.lo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> > > 
> > > From: Henry Chen <henryc.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > 
> > > MT8195 are highly integrated SoC and use PMIC_MT6359 for
> > > power management. This patch adds pwrap master driver to
> > > access PMIC_MT6359.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Henry Chen <henryc.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c | 35
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
> > > b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
> > > index e4de75f35c33..952bc554f443 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
> > > @@ -961,6 +961,23 @@ static int mt8183_regs[] = {
> > >         [PWRAP_WACS2_VLDCLR] =                  0xC28,
> > >  };
> > > 
> > > +static int mt8195_regs[] = {
> > > +       [PWRAP_INIT_DONE2] =            0x0,
> > > +       [PWRAP_STAUPD_CTRL] =           0x4C,
> > > +       [PWRAP_TIMER_EN] =              0x3E4,
> > > +       [PWRAP_INT_EN] =                0x420,
> > > +       [PWRAP_INT_FLG] =               0x428,
> > > +       [PWRAP_INT_CLR] =               0x42C,
> > > +       [PWRAP_INT1_EN] =               0x450,
> > > +       [PWRAP_INT1_FLG] =              0x458,
> > > +       [PWRAP_INT1_CLR] =              0x45C,
> > > +       [PWRAP_WACS2_CMD] =             0x880,
> > > +       [PWRAP_SWINF_2_WDATA_31_0] =    0x884,
> > > +       [PWRAP_SWINF_2_RDATA_31_0] =    0x894,
> > > +       [PWRAP_WACS2_VLDCLR] =          0x8A4,
> > > +       [PWRAP_WACS2_RDATA] =           0x8A8,
> > > +};
> > > +
> > >  static int mt8516_regs[] = {
> > >         [PWRAP_MUX_SEL] =               0x0,
> > >         [PWRAP_WRAP_EN] =               0x4,
> > > @@ -1066,6 +1083,7 @@ enum pwrap_type {
> > >         PWRAP_MT8135,
> > >         PWRAP_MT8173,
> > >         PWRAP_MT8183,
> > > +       PWRAP_MT8195,
> > >         PWRAP_MT8516,
> > >  };
> > > 
> > > @@ -1525,6 +1543,7 @@ static int pwrap_init_cipher(struct
> > > pmic_wrapper *wrp)
> > >                 break;
> > >         case PWRAP_MT6873:
> > >         case PWRAP_MT8183:
> > > +       case PWRAP_MT8195:
> > >                 break;
> > >         }
> > > 
> > > @@ -2025,6 +2044,19 @@ static const struct pmic_wrapper_type
> > > pwrap_mt8183 = {
> > >         .init_soc_specific = pwrap_mt8183_init_soc_specific,
> > >  };
> > > 
> > > +static struct pmic_wrapper_type pwrap_mt8195 = {
> > > +       .regs = mt8195_regs,
> > > +       .type = PWRAP_MT8195,
> > > +       .arb_en_all = 0x777f, /* NEED CONFIRM */
> > > +       .int_en_all = 0x180000, /* NEED CONFIRM */
> > 
> > Please get the confirmative values here then send the next patch,
> > thanks.
> > 
> 
> Yes please. You can send this as a follow-up patch, otherwise I'd
> need to remove
> this from my queue, as I have overseen the fact that not all values
> are confirmed.
> 
> Regards,
> Matthias

All values are confirmed and sorry for I forget to remove those
comments. Could you please help us to remove those comments ?

Before :
.arb_en_all = 0x777f, /* NEED CONFIRM */
.int_en_all = 0x180000, /* NEED CONFIRM */

After :
.arb_en_all = 0x777f,
.int_en_all = 0x180000,

Many thanks
James Lo