Re: [PATCH v2 0/1] lib: Convert UUID runtime test to KUnit

From: David Gow
Date: Thu Jun 10 2021 - 07:53:33 EST

Next message: Sai Prakash Ranjan: "Re: [PATCH] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Optimize partial walk flush for large scatter-gather list"
Previous message: joonas . lahtinen: "Re: Computation of return value being discarded in get_cpu_power() in drivers/platform/x86/intel_ips.c"
In reply to: Andy Shevchenko: "Re: [PATCH v2 0/1] lib: Convert UUID runtime test to KUnit"
Next in thread: Andy Shevchenko: "Re: [PATCH v2 0/1] lib: Convert UUID runtime test to KUnit"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 5:14 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 08:37:29PM -0300, André Almeida wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This patch converts existing UUID runtime test to use KUnit framework.
> >
> > Below, there's a comparison between the old output format and the new
> > one. Keep in mind that even if KUnit seems very verbose, this is the
> > corner case where _every_ test has failed.
> >
> > * This is how the current output looks like in success:
> >
> > test_uuid: all 18 tests passed
> >
> > * And when it fails:
> >
> > test_uuid: conversion test #1 failed on LE data: 'c33f4995-3701-450e-9fbf-206a2e98e576'
> > test_uuid: cmp test #2 failed on LE data: 'c33f4995-3701-450e-9fbf-206a2e98e576'
> > test_uuid: cmp test #2 actual data: 'c33f4995-3701-450e-9fbf-206a2e98e576'
> > test_uuid: conversion test #3 failed on BE data: 'c33f4995-3701-450e-9fbf-206a2e98e576'
> > test_uuid: cmp test #4 failed on BE data: 'c33f4995-3701-450e-9fbf-206a2e98e576'
> > test_uuid: cmp test #4 actual data: 'c33f4995-3701-450e-9fbf-206a2e98e576'
> > test_uuid: conversion test #5 failed on LE data: '64b4371c-77c1-48f9-8221-29f054fc023b'
> > test_uuid: cmp test #6 failed on LE data: '64b4371c-77c1-48f9-8221-29f054fc023b'
> > test_uuid: cmp test #6 actual data: '64b4371c-77c1-48f9-8221-29f054fc023b'
> > test_uuid: conversion test #7 failed on BE data: '64b4371c-77c1-48f9-8221-29f054fc023b'
> > test_uuid: cmp test #8 failed on BE data: '64b4371c-77c1-48f9-8221-29f054fc023b'
> > test_uuid: cmp test #8 actual data: '64b4371c-77c1-48f9-8221-29f054fc023b'
> > test_uuid: conversion test #9 failed on LE data: '0cb4ddff-a545-4401-9d06-688af53e7f84'
> > test_uuid: cmp test #10 failed on LE data: '0cb4ddff-a545-4401-9d06-688af53e7f84'
> > test_uuid: cmp test #10 actual data: '0cb4ddff-a545-4401-9d06-688af53e7f84'
> > test_uuid: conversion test #11 failed on BE data: '0cb4ddff-a545-4401-9d06-688af53e7f84'
> > test_uuid: cmp test #12 failed on BE data: '0cb4ddff-a545-4401-9d06-688af53e7f84'
> > test_uuid: cmp test #12 actual data: '0cb4ddff-a545-4401-9d06-688af53e7f84'
> > test_uuid: negative test #13 passed on wrong LE data: 'c33f4995-3701-450e-9fbf206a2e98e576 '
> > test_uuid: negative test #14 passed on wrong BE data: 'c33f4995-3701-450e-9fbf206a2e98e576 '
> > test_uuid: negative test #15 passed on wrong LE data: '64b4371c-77c1-48f9-8221-29f054XX023b'
> > test_uuid: negative test #16 passed on wrong BE data: '64b4371c-77c1-48f9-8221-29f054XX023b'
> > test_uuid: negative test #17 passed on wrong LE data: '0cb4ddff-a545-4401-9d06-688af53e'
> > test_uuid: negative test #18 passed on wrong BE data: '0cb4ddff-a545-4401-9d06-688af53e'
> > test_uuid: failed 18 out of 18 tests
> >
> >
> > * Now, here's how it looks like with KUnit:
> >
> > ======== [PASSED] uuid ========
> > [PASSED] uuid_correct_be
> > [PASSED] uuid_correct_le
> > [PASSED] uuid_wrong_be
> > [PASSED] uuid_wrong_le
> >
> > * And if every test fail with KUnit:
> >
> > ======== [FAILED] uuid ========
> > [FAILED] uuid_correct_be
> > # uuid_correct_be: ASSERTION FAILED at lib/test_uuid.c:57
> > Expected uuid_parse(data->uuid, &be) == 1, but
> > uuid_parse(data->uuid, &be) == 0
> >
> > failed to parse 'c33f4995-3701-450e-9fbf-206a2e98e576'
> > # uuid_correct_be: not ok 1 - c33f4995-3701-450e-9fbf-206a2e98e576
> > # uuid_correct_be: ASSERTION FAILED at lib/test_uuid.c:57
> > Expected uuid_parse(data->uuid, &be) == 1, but
> > uuid_parse(data->uuid, &be) == 0
> >
> > failed to parse '64b4371c-77c1-48f9-8221-29f054fc023b'
> > # uuid_correct_be: not ok 2 - 64b4371c-77c1-48f9-8221-29f054fc023b
> > # uuid_correct_be: ASSERTION FAILED at lib/test_uuid.c:57
> > Expected uuid_parse(data->uuid, &be) == 1, but
> > uuid_parse(data->uuid, &be) == 0
> >
> > failed to parse '0cb4ddff-a545-4401-9d06-688af53e7f84'
> > # uuid_correct_be: not ok 3 - 0cb4ddff-a545-4401-9d06-688af53e7f84
> > not ok 1 - uuid_correct_be
> >
> > [FAILED] uuid_correct_le
> > # uuid_correct_le: ASSERTION FAILED at lib/test_uuid.c:46
> > Expected guid_parse(data->uuid, &le) == 1, but
> > guid_parse(data->uuid, &le) == 0
> >
> > failed to parse 'c33f4995-3701-450e-9fbf-206a2e98e576'
> > # uuid_correct_le: not ok 1 - c33f4995-3701-450e-9fbf-206a2e98e576
> > # uuid_correct_le: ASSERTION FAILED at lib/test_uuid.c:46
> > Expected guid_parse(data->uuid, &le) == 1, but
> > guid_parse(data->uuid, &le) == 0
> >
> > failed to parse '64b4371c-77c1-48f9-8221-29f054fc023b'
> > # uuid_correct_le: not ok 2 - 64b4371c-77c1-48f9-8221-29f054fc023b
> > # uuid_correct_le: ASSERTION FAILED at lib/test_uuid.c:46
> > Expected guid_parse(data->uuid, &le) == 1, but
> > guid_parse(data->uuid, &le) == 0
> >
> > failed to parse '0cb4ddff-a545-4401-9d06-688af53e7f84'
> > # uuid_correct_le: not ok 3 - 0cb4ddff-a545-4401-9d06-688af53e7f84
> > not ok 2 - uuid_correct_le
> >
> > [FAILED] uuid_wrong_be
> > # uuid_wrong_be: ASSERTION FAILED at lib/test_uuid.c:77
> > Expected uuid_parse(*data, &be) == 0, but
> > uuid_parse(*data, &be) == -22
> >
> > parsing of 'c33f4995-3701-450e-9fbf206a2e98e576 ' should've failed
> > # uuid_wrong_be: not ok 1 - c33f4995-3701-450e-9fbf206a2e98e576
> > # uuid_wrong_be: ASSERTION FAILED at lib/test_uuid.c:77
> > Expected uuid_parse(*data, &be) == 0, but
> > uuid_parse(*data, &be) == -22
> >
> > parsing of '64b4371c-77c1-48f9-8221-29f054XX023b' should've failed
> > # uuid_wrong_be: not ok 2 - 64b4371c-77c1-48f9-8221-29f054XX023b
> > # uuid_wrong_be: ASSERTION FAILED at lib/test_uuid.c:77
> > Expected uuid_parse(*data, &be) == 0, but
> > uuid_parse(*data, &be) == -22
> >
> > parsing of '0cb4ddff-a545-4401-9d06-688af53e' should've failed
> > # uuid_wrong_be: not ok 3 - 0cb4ddff-a545-4401-9d06-688af53e
> > not ok 3 - uuid_wrong_be
> >
> > [FAILED] uuid_wrong_le
> > # uuid_wrong_le: ASSERTION FAILED at lib/test_uuid.c:68
> > Expected guid_parse(*data, &le) == 0, but
> > guid_parse(*data, &le) == -22
> >
> > parsing of 'c33f4995-3701-450e-9fbf206a2e98e576 ' should've failed
> > # uuid_wrong_le: not ok 1 - c33f4995-3701-450e-9fbf206a2e98e576
> > # uuid_wrong_le: ASSERTION FAILED at lib/test_uuid.c:68
> > Expected guid_parse(*data, &le) == 0, but
> > guid_parse(*data, &le) == -22
> >
> > parsing of '64b4371c-77c1-48f9-8221-29f054XX023b' should've failed
> > # uuid_wrong_le: not ok 2 - 64b4371c-77c1-48f9-8221-29f054XX023b
> > # uuid_wrong_le: ASSERTION FAILED at lib/test_uuid.c:68
> > Expected guid_parse(*data, &le) == 0, but
> > guid_parse(*data, &le) == -22
> >
> > parsing of '0cb4ddff-a545-4401-9d06-688af53e' should've failed
> > # uuid_wrong_le: not ok 3 - 0cb4ddff-a545-4401-9d06-688af53e
> > not ok 4 - uuid_wrong_le

Note that this output is from the kunit_tool script, which parses the
test output.
It does include a summary line:
[04:41:01] Testing complete. 4 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed.

Note that this does only count the number of "tests" run --- the
individual UUIDs are parameters to the same test, so aren't counted
independently by the wrapper at the moment.

That being said, the raw output looks like this (all tests passed):
TAP version 14
1..1
# Subtest: uuid
1..4
# uuid_correct_be: ok 1 - c33f4995-3701-450e-9fbf-206a2e98e576
# uuid_correct_be: ok 2 - 64b4371c-77c1-48f9-8221-29f054fc023b
# uuid_correct_be: ok 3 - 0cb4ddff-a545-4401-9d06-688af53e7f84
ok 1 - uuid_correct_be
# uuid_correct_le: ok 1 - c33f4995-3701-450e-9fbf-206a2e98e576
# uuid_correct_le: ok 2 - 64b4371c-77c1-48f9-8221-29f054fc023b
# uuid_correct_le: ok 3 - 0cb4ddff-a545-4401-9d06-688af53e7f84
ok 2 - uuid_correct_le
# uuid_wrong_be: ok 1 - c33f4995-3701-450e-9fbf206a2e98e576
# uuid_wrong_be: ok 2 - 64b4371c-77c1-48f9-8221-29f054XX023b
# uuid_wrong_be: ok 3 - 0cb4ddff-a545-4401-9d06-688af53e
ok 3 - uuid_wrong_be
# uuid_wrong_le: ok 1 - c33f4995-3701-450e-9fbf206a2e98e576
# uuid_wrong_le: ok 2 - 64b4371c-77c1-48f9-8221-29f054XX023b
# uuid_wrong_le: ok 3 - 0cb4ddff-a545-4401-9d06-688af53e
ok 4 - uuid_wrong_le
ok 1 - uuid

A test which failed could look like this:
# uuid_correct_le: ASSERTION FAILED at lib/test_uuid.c:46
Expected guid_parse(data->uuid, &le) == 0, but
guid_parse(data->uuid, &le) == -22

failed to parse 'c33f499x5-3701-450e-9fbf-206a2e98e576'
# uuid_correct_le: not ok 1 - c33f499x5-3701-450e-9fbf-206a2e98e576
# uuid_correct_le: ok 2 - 64b4371c-77c1-48f9-8221-29f054fc023b
# uuid_correct_le: ok 3 - 0cb4ddff-a545-4401-9d06-688af53e7f84
not ok 2 - uuid_correct_le

>
> Thanks!
>
> It's not your fault but I think we need to defer this until KUnit gains support
> of the run statistics. My guts telling me if we allow more and more conversions
> like this the point will vanish and nobody will care.

Did the test statistics patch we sent out before meet your expectations?
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-kselftest/patch/20201211072319.533803-1-davidgow@xxxxxxxxxx/

If so, we can tidy it up and try to push it through straight away, we
were just waiting for a review from someone who wanted the feature.

> I like the code, but I can give my tag after KUnit prints some kind of this:
>
> * This is how the current output looks like in success:
>
> test_uuid: all 18 tests passed
>
> * And when it fails:
>
> test_uuid: failed 18 out of 18 tests
>

There are some small restrictions on the exact format KUnit can use
for this if we want to continue to match the (K)TAP specification
which is being adopted by kselftest. The patch linked above should
give something formatted like:

# test_uuid: (0 / 4) tests failed (0 / 12 test parameters)

Would that work for you?

Cheers,
-- David

Next message: Sai Prakash Ranjan: "Re: [PATCH] iommu/io-pgtable-arm: Optimize partial walk flush for large scatter-gather list"
Previous message: joonas . lahtinen: "Re: Computation of return value being discarded in get_cpu_power() in drivers/platform/x86/intel_ips.c"
In reply to: Andy Shevchenko: "Re: [PATCH v2 0/1] lib: Convert UUID runtime test to KUnit"
Next in thread: Andy Shevchenko: "Re: [PATCH v2 0/1] lib: Convert UUID runtime test to KUnit"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]