Re: [PATCH 4/9] nvmem: sprd: Fix an error message

[Srinivas Kandagatla]

On 11/06/2021 09:56, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 09:33:43AM +0100, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> > From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > 'ret' is known to be 0 here.
> > The expected error status is stored in 'status', so use it instead.
> >
> > Also change %d in %u, because status is an u32, not a int.
> >
> > Fixes: 096030e7f449 ("nvmem: sprd: Add Spreadtrum SoCs eFuse support")
> > Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Acked-by: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   drivers/nvmem/sprd-efuse.c | 2 +-
> >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/sprd-efuse.c b/drivers/nvmem/sprd-efuse.c
> > index 5d394559edf2..e3e721d4c205 100644
> > --- a/drivers/nvmem/sprd-efuse.c
> > +++ b/drivers/nvmem/sprd-efuse.c
> > @@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ static int sprd_efuse_raw_prog(struct sprd_efuse *efuse, u32 blk, bool doub,
> >   	status = readl(efuse->base + SPRD_EFUSE_ERR_FLAG);
> >   	if (status) {
> >   		dev_err(efuse->dev,
> > -			"write error status %d of block %d\n", ret, blk);
> > +			"write error status %u of block %d\n", status, blk);
>
> Shouldn't this be %pe and not %u?

This is not error pointer its status value read back from a register.

I think %u should be good here.

--srini
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h