Re: [PATCH v4] soundwire: intel: move to auxiliary bus

[Vinod Koul]

On 11-05-21, 13:21, Bard Liao wrote:
> From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Now that the auxiliary_bus exists, there's no reason to use platform
> devices as children of a PCI device any longer.
> 
> This patch refactors the code by extending a basic auxiliary device
> with Intel link-specific structures that need to be passed between
> controller and link levels. This refactoring is much cleaner with no
> need for cross-pointers between device and link structures.
> 
> Note that the auxiliary bus API has separate init and add steps, which
> requires more attention in the error unwinding paths. The main loop
> needs to deal with kfree() and auxiliary_device_uninit() for the
> current iteration before jumping to the common label which releases
> everything allocated in prior iterations.

Applied, thanks

-- 
~Vinod