Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am64-main: Update the location of ATF in SRAM and increase its max size

From: Suman Anna
Date: Mon Jun 14 2021 - 14:16:27 EST


Hi Aswath,

On 6/9/21 10:24 AM, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
>
>
> On 09/06/21 8:52 pm, Aswath Govindraju wrote:
>> Hi Lokesh,
>>
>> On 09/06/21 7:59 pm, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 07/06/21 7:08 pm, Aswath Govindraju wrote:
>>>> Due to a limitation for USB DFU boot mode, SPL load address has to be less
>>>> than or equal to 0x70001000. So, load address of SPL and ATF have been
>>>> moved to 0x70000000 and 0x701a0000 respectively.
>>>>
>>>> Also, the maximum size of ATF has been increased to 0x1c000 [1].
>>>>
>>>> Therefore, update ATF's location and maximum size accordingly in the device
>>>> tree file.
>>>>
>>>> [1] - https://git.trustedfirmware.org/TF-A/trusted-firmware-a.git/commit/?id=2fb5312f61a7de8b7a70e1639199c4f14a10b6f9
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Aswath Govindraju <a-govindraju@xxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am64-main.dtsi | 4 ++--
>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am64-main.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am64-main.dtsi
>>>> index ca59d1f711f8..fcd12b6f10f6 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am64-main.dtsi
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am64-main.dtsi
>>>> @@ -13,8 +13,8 @@
>>>> #size-cells = <1>;
>>>> ranges = <0x0 0x00 0x70000000 0x200000>;
>>>>
>>>> - atf-sram@0 {
>>>> - reg = <0x0 0x1a000>;
>>>> + atf-sram@1a0000 {
>>>> + reg = <0x1a0000 0x1c000>;
>>>
>>> After thinking a bot more, isn't size be 0x20000?
>>> ATF is allocated with 125KB no? no point keeping the ~3 as hole IMO.
>>>
>>
>> The max size of ATF as defined above in [1] is 0x1c000 and as the
>> argument has to reflect it I have modified it to the same.
>

I personally prefer that the size increase and address relocation are split up
into two separate patches for appropriate version compatibility. TFA 2.5 has
updated the size to 0x1c000, so I would like to see that as the first patch. We
should be able to merge that change right away. I see there is some on-going
discussion around the relocated address, so it can fall in line with the
corresponding SYSFW reservation patch.

regards
Suman

> ahh..Got it. Ignore my comment.
>
> Thanks and regards,
> Lokesh
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Aswath
>>
>>
>>> Thanks and regards,
>>> Lokesh
>>>
>>>> };
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>>
>>