Re: [PATCH 4/8] regulator: qcom-rpmh: Add new regulator types found on SA8155p adp board

[Bhupesh Sharma]

On Mon, 14 Jun 2021 at 21:47, Bjorn Andersson
<bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Mon 07 Jun 07:30 CDT 2021, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 7 Jun 2021 at 17:39, Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 2:41 PM Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > SA8155p-adp board has two new regulator types - pmm8155au_1 and
> > > > pmm8155au_2.
> > > >
> > > > The output power management circuits in these regulators include:
> > > > - FTS510 smps,
> > > > - HFS510 smps, and
> > > > - LDO510 linear regulators
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > > Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Cc: Andy Gross <agross@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Cc: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > Cc: linux-gpio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > Cc: bhupesh.linux@xxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > > Use --cc or similar option when run `git send-email`, no need to
> > > pollute the commit message with these.
> >
> > It's just a matter of preference IMO. I prefer to use a Cc list
> > here.
> >
>
> The Cc list in the commit message will be committed to the git history
> and there it carries the information that you specifically made sure
> that these people saw the patch. So please limit the use to that
> purpose.

I understand, but different maintainers like different formats here.
Infact, there
are suggestions not to use --cc as some opens-source lists are known to drop
folks from Cc list accidentally (mentioned via --cc) , so some folks
prefer the git log to contain the Cc list instead.

But I can trim the same for v2.

> > > > +static const struct rpmh_vreg_init_data pmm8155au_1_vreg_data[] = {
> > >
> > >
> > > > +       {},
> > >
> > > Comma is not needed in the terminator line.
> >
> > Hmm.. it's similar to the syntax already used at several places in this file.
> > See ' struct rpmh_vreg_init_data pm8150l_vreg_data[] ' for example.
> >
> > Unless there is an obvious issue with it, let's use the same to keep
> > things similar from a syntax p-o-v.
> >
>
> Those other places shouldn't use the ',' either, so please help set a
> better precedence.

Sure, I will send that out as a separate clean-up patch.

Regards,
Bhupesh