Re: [PATCH v3] perf annotate: Add itrace options support

From: Yang Jihong
Date: Tue Jun 15 2021 - 03:19:54 EST


Hello, Leo and Arnaldo,

On 2021/6/15 12:04, Leo Yan wrote:
Hi Jihong,

Loop in Adrain to be aware this AUX trace change.

On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 10:40:36AM +0800, Yang Jihong wrote:
The "auxtrace_info" and "auxtrace" functions are not set in "tool" member of
"annotate". As a result, perf annotate does not support parsing itrace data.

Before:

# perf record -e arm_spe_0/branch_filter=1/ -a sleep 1
[ perf record: Woken up 9 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 20.874 MB perf.data ]
# perf annotate --stdio
Error:
The perf.data data has no samples!

Solution:
1.Add itrace options in help,
2.Set hook functions of "auxtrace_info" and "auxtrace" in perf_tool.

After:

# perf record --all-user -e arm_spe_0/branch_filter=1/ ls
Couldn't synthesize bpf events.
perf.data
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.010 MB perf.data ]
# perf annotate --stdio

Percent | Source code & Disassembly of libc-2.28.so for branch-miss (1 samples, percent: local period)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
:
:
:
: Disassembly of section .text:
:
: 0000000000066180 <__getdelim@@GLIBC_2.17>:
0.00 : 66180: stp x29, x30, [sp, #-96]!
0.00 : 66184: cmp x0, #0x0
0.00 : 66188: ccmp x1, #0x0, #0x4, ne // ne = any
0.00 : 6618c: mov x29, sp
0.00 : 66190: stp x24, x25, [sp, #56]
0.00 : 66194: stp x26, x27, [sp, #72]
0.00 : 66198: str x28, [sp, #88]
0.00 : 6619c: b.eq 66450 <__getdelim@@GLIBC_2.17+0x2d0> // b.none
0.00 : 661a0: stp x22, x23, [x29, #40]

[...]

Nitpick: the above example is not typical for annotation, since it
doesn't show any C source code with samples. At my side, I tested this
patch and confirmed the patch works well with below commands:

# gcc -ggdb -O0 -o task_migration task_migration.c
# perf record -e cs_etm/@tmc_etr0/u --per-thread ./task_migration
# perf annotate --itrace=i1000 --stdio

The complete annotation result can be reviewed at [1].

Thus for this patch:

Tested-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@xxxxxxxxxx>

[1] https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/pHz74MYRPJ/

[...]
.

Thank you very much for the detailed testing of this patch :)

Yes, this example may not be well written.
Arnaldo, please check whether the commit message needs to be modified. If yes, I will resubmit a new v4 patch

Thanks,
Jihong