Re: [PATCH RFCv3 3/3] lib/test_printf: add test cases for '%pD'

[Rasmus Villemoes]

On 15/06/2021 09.07, Justin He wrote:
> Hi Petr
> 

>>> +static void __init
>>> +f_d_path(void)
>>> +{
>>> +   test("(null)", "%pD", NULL);
>>> +   test("(efault)", "%pD", PTR_INVALID);
>>> +
>>> +   is_prepend_buf = true;
>>> +   test("/bravo/alfa   |/bravo/alfa   ", "%-14pD|%*pD", &test_file, -14,
>> &test_file);
>>> +   test("   /bravo/alfa|   /bravo/alfa", "%14pD|%*pD", &test_file, 14,
>> &test_file);
>>> +   test("   /bravo/alfa|/bravo/alfa   ", "%14pD|%-14pD", &test_file,
>> &test_file);
>>
>> Please, add more test for scenarios when the path does not fit into
>> the buffer or when there are no limitations, ...
> 
> Indeed, thanks

Doesn't the existing test() helper do this for you automatically?

        /*
         * Every fmt+args is subjected to four tests: Three where we
         * tell vsnprintf varying buffer sizes (plenty, not quite
         * enough and 0), and then we also test that kvasprintf would
         * be able to print it as expected.
         */

I don't see why one would need to do anything special for %pD.

Rasmus