Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] module: add elf_check_module_arch for module specific elf arch checks

[Jessica Yu]

+++ Segher Boessenkool [15/06/21 07:50 -0500]:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 02:17:40PM +0200, Jessica Yu wrote:
> > +int __weak elf_check_module_arch(Elf_Ehdr *hdr)
> > +{
> > +       return 1;
> > +}
>
> But is this a good idea?  It isn't useful to be able to attempt to load
> a module not compiled for your architecture, and it increases the attack
> surface tremendously.  These checks are one of the few things that can
> *not* be weak symbols, imo.

Hm, could you please elaborate a bit more? This patchset is adding
extra Elf header checks specifically for powerpc, and the module
loader usually provides arch-specific hooks via weak symbols. We are
just providing an new hook here, which should act as a no-op if it
isn't used.

So if an architecture wants to provide extra header checks, it can do
so by overriding the new weak symbol. Otherwise, the weak function acts as
a noop. We also already have the existing elf_check_arch() check for each
arch and that is *not* a weak symbol.