Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] dt-bindings: serial: Convert Cortina-Access UART to json-schema

[Rob Herring]

On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 8:39 AM Alex Nemirovsky
<Alex.Nemirovsky@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jun 15, 2021, at 7:13 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 01:36:39PM +0000, Alex Nemirovsky wrote:
> >> MAINTAINERS modification was made in the initial version 1.  We made no changes to it since then,
> >> thus not sure what we could at to  Changelog which would add value or clarity for others
> >> from the v1.
> >>
> >>> On Jun 15, 2021, at 4:53 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, May 09, 2021 at 11:45:17AM -0700, Alex Nemirovsky wrote:
> >>>> From: Jason Li <jason.li@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>
> >>>> Convert the Cortina-Access UART binding to DT schema format.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Jason Li <jason.li@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> .../serial/cortina-access,serial.yaml         | 46 +++++++++++++++++++
> >>>> .../devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.yaml  |  2 +
> >>>> MAINTAINERS                                   |  6 +++
> >>>
> >>> You are also adding a MAINTAINERS entry here, which is not listed in the
> >>> changelog text, so I couldn't take it anyway :(
> >
> > Add the maintainers entry in the first patch, with the driver please.
>
> The change to MAINTAINERS here add a new file into the DT documentation.
> Should it not be grouped into the dt-binding portion and reviewed by the DT time for which this patch
> is CC’ed to? Why would moving the DT documentation file that is introduced be into the first patch, which is the
> serial driver itself be the correct approach?

The binding doesn't actually need a MAINTAINERS entry (though having
one is fine). get_maintainers.pl will also pull emails from the
binding schema.

Rob