Re: [PATCH 09/11] PCI: add matching checks for driver_override binding

From: Jason Gunthorpe
Date: Tue Jun 15 2021 - 16:42:23 EST


On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 10:20:49AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jun 2021 12:04:58 -0300
> Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 09:00:29AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> >
> > > "vfio" override in PCI-core plays out for other override types. Also I
> > > don't think dynamic IDs should be handled uniquely, new_id_store()
> > > should gain support for flags and userspace should be able to add new
> > > dynamic ID with override-only matches to the table. Thanks,
> >
> > Why? Once all the enforcement is stripped out the only purpose of the
> > new flag is to signal a different prepration of modules.alias - which
> > won't happen for the new_id path anyhow
>
> Because new_id allows the admin to insert a new pci_device_id which has
> been extended to include a flags field and intentionally handling
> dynamic IDs differently from static IDs seems like generally a bad
> thing.

I'd agree with you if there was a functional difference at runtime,
but since that was all removed, I don't think we should touch new_id.

This ends up effectively being only a kbuild related patch that
changes how modules.alias is built.

Jason