Re: [PATCH] opp: of: Allow lazy-linking of required-opps to non genpd

[Viresh Kumar]

On 17-06-21, 13:09, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> On 6/17/21 12:33 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 17-06-21, 10:13, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
> >> The devfreq driver(exynos-bus.c) has used the dev_pm_opp_set_rate()
> >> and used the passive governor without the required-opp property.
> > 
> > Which is fine.
> > 
> >> I have a plan to use the required-opp property
> >> between devfreq drivers (exynos-bus.c) with dev_pm_opp_set_rate().
> >>
> >> I'll support them on later if this approach doesn't break the any
> >> rule of required-opp property.
> > 
> > You will be required to make some changes in core for that I am
> > afraid. It won't work automatically.
> 
> Do you think that better to use clk_enable/regulator_enable directly
> instead of dev_pm_opp_set_rate() for using required-opp property?

No. All I am saying is that the OPP core won't work for your use case
today and may need some updates.

-- 
viresh