Re: [PATCH] drm/panfrost:modify 'break' to 'continue' to traverse the circulation

From: Chunyou Tang
Date: Fri Jun 18 2021 - 23:19:05 EST


Hi Steve,
1,
from
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/31644881-134a-2d6e-dddf-e658a3a8176b@xxxxxxx/
I can see what your sent,I used a wrong email address,Now it correct.
2,
> >Unless I'm mistaken the situation where some mappings may be NULL is
> >caused by the loop in panfrost_lookup_bos() not completing
> >successfully
> >(panfrost_gem_mapping_get() returning NULL). In this case if
> >mappings[i]
> >is NULL then all following mappings must also be NULL. So 'break'
> >allows
> >us to skip the later ones. Admittedly the performance here isn't
> >important so I'm not sure it's worth the optimisation, but AIUI this
> >code isn't actually wrong.

from panfrost_lookup_bos(),you can see:
for (i = 0; i < job->bo_count; i++) {
struct panfrost_gem_mapping *mapping;

bo = to_panfrost_bo(job->bos[i]);
ICUBE_DEBUG_PRINTK("panfrost bo gem handle=0x%x
is_dumb=%d\n", bo->gem_handle, bo->is_dumb);
if (!bo->is_dumb) {
mapping = panfrost_gem_mapping_get(bo, priv);
if (!mapping) {
ret = -EINVAL;
break;
}

atomic_inc(&bo->gpu_usecount);
job->mappings[i] = mapping;
} else {
atomic_inc(&bo->gpu_usecount);
job->mappings[i] = NULL;
}
}
if bo->is_dumb is TRUE,the job->mappings[i] will set to NULL,and the
while will be continue,so if job->mappings[i] is NULL,the following
can not be NULL.

3,
I've had this problem in our project,the value of is_dumb like these:
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
so,when job->mappings[i] is NULL,we can not break the while in
panfrost_job_cleanup().

thanks
Chunyou

ÓÚ Fri, 18 Jun 2021 13:43:25 +0100
Steven Price <steven.price@xxxxxxx> дµÀ:

> On 17/06/2021 09:04, ChunyouTang wrote:
> > From: ChunyouTang <tangchunyou@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > The 'break' can cause 'Memory manager not clean during takedown'
> >
> > It cannot use break to finish the circulation,it should use
> >
> > continue to traverse the circulation.it should put every mapping
> >
> > which is not NULL.
>
> You don't appear to have answered my question about whether you've
> actually seen this happen (and ideally what circumstances). In my
> previous email[1] I explained why I don't think this is needed. You
> need to convince me that I've overlooked something.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Steve
>
> [1]
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/31644881-134a-2d6e-dddf-e658a3a8176b%40arm.com
>
> > Signed-off-by: ChunyouTang <tangchunyou@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_job.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_job.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_job.c index
> > 6003cfeb1322..52bccc1d2d42 100644 ---
> > a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_job.c +++
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_job.c @@ -281,7 +281,7 @@
> > static void panfrost_job_cleanup(struct kref *ref) if
> > (job->mappings) { for (i = 0; i < job->bo_count; i++) {
> > if (!job->mappings[i])
> > - break;
> > + continue;
> >
> > atomic_dec(&job->mappings[i]->obj->gpu_usecount);
> > panfrost_gem_mapping_put(job->mappings[i]);
> >