Re: commit 3d5bfbd97163 versus -rt

[Rasmus Villemoes]

On 18/06/2021 22.04, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15 2021 at 14:35, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
>>  [<8016fb80>] (generic_handle_irq) from [<8043e98c>]
>> (mpc8xxx_gpio_irq_cascade+0xac/0xd0)
>>  [<8043e8e0>] (mpc8xxx_gpio_irq_cascade) from [<80171c80>]
>> (irq_forced_thread_fn+0x38/0x8c)
>>   r5:80e282c0 r4:80deda00
>>  [<80171c48>] (irq_forced_thread_fn) from [<80171eb4>]
>> (irq_thread+0x11c/0x238)
> .
>> Reverting commit 3d5bfbd9716318b1ca5c38488aa69f64d38a9aa5 (gpio:
>> mpc8xxx: change the gpio interrupt flags.) makes it go away, as does
>> disabling CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT or simply booting a vanilla v5.10.42 (where
>> that option exists but cannot be selected).
>>
>> This seems to be the kind of thing where an -rt expert can immediately
>> see what's wrong and how to fix it. Ideas anyone?
> 
> Let me explain. The force threaded interrupt code in mainline made the
> wrong assumption that disabling softirqs is sufficient to provide the
> semantics of non-threaded handler invocation. This turned out to be
> wrong and caused people to do fancy workarounds.
> 
> See 81e2073c175b ("genirq: Disable interrupts for force threaded
> handlers") for details.
> 
> So people started to remove IRQF_NO_THREAD or local_irq_save/restore
> pairs in drivers.
> 
> But 3d5bfbd97163 ("gpio: mpc8xxx: change the gpio interrupt flags.") has
> nothing to do with that:
> 
>     "Delete the interrupt IRQF_NO_THREAD flags in order to gpio interrupts
>      can be threaded to allow high-priority processes to preempt."
> 
> This changelog is blatantly wrong. In mainline forced irq threads have
> always been invoked with softirqs disabled, which obviously makes them
> non-preemptible. And on RT this would have exploded exactly in the way
> you observed.
> 
> The commit predates 81e2073c175b and therefore was obviously never
> tested neither on mainline nor on RT.

Thanks. Commit 81e2073c175b was included in 5.10.y per 5.10.26, and I
can confirm that booting a vanilla 5.10.25 with threadirqs does indeed
trigger the same splat I see on 5.10.41-rt42.

> Bartosz, please revert this ASAP.

Thanks for confirming that reverting 3d5bfbd97163 is the right thing to do.

Rasmus