Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] regulator: qcom,rpmh-regulator: Add support for pmic available on SA8155p-adp board

From: Mark Brown
Date: Mon Jun 21 2021 - 14:46:37 EST


On Thu, 17 Jun 2021 10:47:07 +0530, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
> Changes since v2:
> -----------------
> - v2 series can be found here: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20210615074543.26700-1-bhupesh.sharma@xxxxxxxxxx/T/#m8303d27d561b30133992da88198abb78ea833e21
> - Addressed review comments from Bjorn and Mark.
> - As per suggestion from Bjorn, seperated the patches in different
> patchsets (specific to each subsystem) to ease review and patch application.
>
> [...]

Applied to

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/5] dt-bindings: regulator: qcom,rpmh-regulator: Arrange compatibles alphabetically
commit: 85adaac269c36d8e2e0a5de87a1dc4ec06e984f1
[2/5] dt-bindings: regulator: qcom,rpmh-regulator: Add compatible for SA8155p-adp board pmic
commit: 66376e152303bb60d6a75328b7bc998de86f8c08
[3/5] regulator: qcom-rpmh: Cleanup terminator line commas
commit: ba5dabf40e9143ff6c48943b76a532d5ab34d0e8
[4/5] regulator: qcom-rpmh: Add terminator at the end of pm7325x_vreg_data[] array
commit: f26cdadad729743888eb4ac2c17eac3cf845b493
[5/5] regulator: qcom-rpmh: Add new regulator found on SA8155p adp board
commit: 9a336ed97d00bb69547272fc7d0439802bece375

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark