Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] cpufreq: Add Active Stats calls tracking frequency changes

From: Viresh Kumar
Date: Tue Jun 22 2021 - 05:33:04 EST


Not commenting on the idea itself but just the code changes here.

On 22-06-21, 08:59, Lukasz Luba wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index 802abc925b2a..d79cb9310572 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
>
> #define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
>
> +#include <linux/active_stats.h>
> #include <linux/cpu.h>
> #include <linux/cpufreq.h>
> #include <linux/cpu_cooling.h>
> @@ -387,6 +388,8 @@ static void cpufreq_notify_transition(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>
> cpufreq_stats_record_transition(policy, freqs->new);
> policy->cur = freqs->new;
> +
> + active_stats_cpu_freq_change(policy->cpu, freqs->new);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -2085,6 +2088,8 @@ unsigned int cpufreq_driver_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> policy->cpuinfo.max_freq);
> cpufreq_stats_record_transition(policy, freq);
>
> + active_stats_cpu_freq_fast_change(policy->cpu, freq);
> +

It would have been better if you would have modified
cpufreq_stats_record_transition() instead, since that is there for
similar kind of stats.

Plus don't you need to record this for all policy->cpus instead of
just policy->cpu ?

--
viresh