Re: [v7 5/5] drm/panel-simple: Add Samsung ATNA33XC20

[Doug Anderson]

Hi,

On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 11:42 AM Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Doug,
>
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 08:34:51AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 3:01 AM Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Rajeev
> > > On Sat, Jun 19, 2021 at 04:10:30PM +0530, Rajeev Nandan wrote:
> > > > Add Samsung 13.3" FHD eDP AMOLED panel.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Rajeev Nandan <rajeevny@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > Changes in v4:
> > > > - New
> > > >
> > > > Changes in v5:
> > > > - Remove "uses_dpcd_backlight" property, not required now. (Douglas)
> > > >
> > > > Changes in v7:
> > > > - Update disable_to_power_off and power_to_enable delays. (Douglas)
> > > >
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c
> > > > index 86e5a45..4adc44a 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c
> > > > @@ -3562,6 +3562,36 @@ static const struct panel_desc rocktech_rk101ii01d_ct = {
> > > >       .connector_type = DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_LVDS,
> > > >  };
> > > >
> > > > +static const struct drm_display_mode samsung_atna33xc20_mode = {
> > > > +     .clock = 138770,
> > > > +     .hdisplay = 1920,
> > > > +     .hsync_start = 1920 + 48,
> > > > +     .hsync_end = 1920 + 48 + 32,
> > > > +     .htotal = 1920 + 48 + 32 + 80,
> > > > +     .vdisplay = 1080,
> > > > +     .vsync_start = 1080 + 8,
> > > > +     .vsync_end = 1080 + 8 + 8,
> > > > +     .vtotal = 1080 + 8 + 8 + 16,
> > > > +     .flags = DRM_MODE_FLAG_PHSYNC | DRM_MODE_FLAG_NVSYNC,
> > > > +};
> > > > +
> > > > +static const struct panel_desc samsung_atna33xc20 = {
> > > > +     .modes = &samsung_atna33xc20_mode,
> > > > +     .num_modes = 1,
> > > > +     .bpc = 10,
> > > > +     .size = {
> > > > +             .width = 294,
> > > > +             .height = 165,
> > > > +     },
> > > > +     .delay = {
> > > > +             .disable_to_power_off = 200,
> > > > +             .power_to_enable = 400,
> > > > +             .hpd_absent_delay = 200,
> > > > +             .unprepare = 500,
> > > > +     },
> > > > +     .connector_type = DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_eDP,
> > > > +};
> > >
> > > bus_format is missing. There should be a warning about this when you
> > > probe the display.
> >
> > Sam: I'm curious about the requirement of hardcoding bus_format like
> > this for eDP panels. Most eDP panels support a variety of bits per
> > pixel and do so dynamically. Ones I've poked at freely support 6bpp
> > and 8bpp. Presumably this one supports both of those modes and also
> > 10bpp. I haven't done detailed research on it, but it would also
> > surprise me if the "bus format" for a given bpp needed to be specified
> > for eDP. Presumably since eDP has most of the "autodetect" type
> > features of DP then if the format needed to be accounted for that you
> > could query the hardware?
> >
> > Looking at the datasheet for the ti-sn65dsi86 MIPI-to-eDP bridge chip
> > I see that it explicitly calls out the bus formats that it supports
> > for the MIPI side but doesn't call out anything for eDP. That would
> > tend to support my belief that there isn't variance on the eDP side...
> >
> > Maybe the right fix is to actually change the check not to give a
> > warning for eDP panels? ...or am I misunderstanding?
>
> I have never dived into the datasheets of eDP panels so I do not know.
> The checks were added based on what we had in-tree and it is no suprise
> if they need an update or are just plain wrong.
> I expect you to be in a better position to make the call here - but we
> should not add panels that triggers warnings so either fix the warnings
> or fix the panel description.

Agreed. I'd support a patch that removes this warning for eDP panels
unless someone knows that it makes sense. I haven't been able to find
anything indicating that it does.

-Doug