Re: [PATCH V4 2/4] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Migrate to ->offline() instead of ->stop_cpu()
From: Viresh Kumar
Date: Wed Jun 23 2021 - 21:52:47 EST
On 23-06-21, 17:13, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> As mentioned already in
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/CAJZ5v0g2tCZptcqh+c55YYiO7rDHmZivMLsmpq_7005zNPN1xg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
Sorry about failing to reply over that, I got confused somehow..
> this isn't particularly clean, because intel_pstate_cpu_offline() is
> also used in the passive mode where the above call is not needed.
intel_pstate_clear_update_util_hook() returns early if the hook was never
registered, and so calling it was safe, but yes not very clean.
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Combine ->stop_cpu() and ->offline()
>
> Combine the ->stop_cpu() and ->offline() callback routines for the
> active mode of intel_pstate so as to avoid setting the ->stop_cpu
> callback pointer which is going to be dropped from the framework.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> @@ -2577,11 +2577,13 @@ static int intel_pstate_cpu_online(struc
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static void intel_pstate_stop_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> +static int intel_pstate_stop_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> {
> pr_debug("CPU %d stopping\n", policy->cpu);
>
> intel_pstate_clear_update_util_hook(policy->cpu);
> +
> + return intel_pstate_cpu_offline(policy);
> }
>
> static int intel_pstate_cpu_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> @@ -2654,8 +2656,7 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver intel_pstat
> .resume = intel_pstate_resume,
> .init = intel_pstate_cpu_init,
> .exit = intel_pstate_cpu_exit,
> - .stop_cpu = intel_pstate_stop_cpu,
> - .offline = intel_pstate_cpu_offline,
> + .offline = intel_pstate_stop_cpu,
I would suggest to rename intel_pstate_cpu_offline() as
intel_cpufreq_cpu_offline() and intel_pstate_stop_cpu() as
intel_pstate_cpu_offline(), so we remove the stop-cpu terminology completely.
Either way:
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> .online = intel_pstate_cpu_online,
> .update_limits = intel_pstate_update_limits,
> .name = "intel_pstate",
--
viresh