Re: [PATCH v17 5/6] KVM: arm64: ioctl to fetch/store tags in a guest

[Marc Zyngier]

Hi Steven,

On Mon, 21 Jun 2021 12:17:15 +0100,
Steven Price <steven.price@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> The VMM may not wish to have it's own mapping of guest memory mapped
> with PROT_MTE because this causes problems if the VMM has tag checking
> enabled (the guest controls the tags in physical RAM and it's unlikely
> the tags are correct for the VMM).
> 
> Instead add a new ioctl which allows the VMM to easily read/write the
> tags from guest memory, allowing the VMM's mapping to be non-PROT_MTE
> while the VMM can still read/write the tags for the purpose of
> migration.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  3 ++
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/mte-def.h  |  1 +
>  arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 11 +++++
>  arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c              |  7 +++
>  arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c            | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/uapi/linux/kvm.h          |  1 +
>  6 files changed, 105 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 309e36cc1b42..6a2ac4636d42 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -729,6 +729,9 @@ int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_get_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_has_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  			       struct kvm_device_attr *attr);
>  
> +long kvm_vm_ioctl_mte_copy_tags(struct kvm *kvm,
> +				struct kvm_arm_copy_mte_tags *copy_tags);
> +
>  /* Guest/host FPSIMD coordination helpers */
>  int kvm_arch_vcpu_run_map_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  void kvm_arch_vcpu_load_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/mte-def.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mte-def.h
> index cf241b0f0a42..626d359b396e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/mte-def.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mte-def.h
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
>  
>  #define MTE_GRANULE_SIZE	UL(16)
>  #define MTE_GRANULE_MASK	(~(MTE_GRANULE_SIZE - 1))
> +#define MTE_GRANULES_PER_PAGE	(PAGE_SIZE / MTE_GRANULE_SIZE)
>  #define MTE_TAG_SHIFT		56
>  #define MTE_TAG_SIZE		4
>  #define MTE_TAG_MASK		GENMASK((MTE_TAG_SHIFT + (MTE_TAG_SIZE - 1)), MTE_TAG_SHIFT)
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> index 24223adae150..b3edde68bc3e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> @@ -184,6 +184,17 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_events {
>  	__u32 reserved[12];
>  };
>  
> +struct kvm_arm_copy_mte_tags {
> +	__u64 guest_ipa;
> +	__u64 length;
> +	void __user *addr;
> +	__u64 flags;
> +	__u64 reserved[2];
> +};
> +
> +#define KVM_ARM_TAGS_TO_GUEST		0
> +#define KVM_ARM_TAGS_FROM_GUEST		1
> +
>  /* If you need to interpret the index values, here is the key: */
>  #define KVM_REG_ARM_COPROC_MASK		0x000000000FFF0000
>  #define KVM_REG_ARM_COPROC_SHIFT	16
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> index 28ce26a68f09..511f3716fe33 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> @@ -1359,6 +1359,13 @@ long kvm_arch_vm_ioctl(struct file *filp,
>  
>  		return 0;
>  	}
> +	case KVM_ARM_MTE_COPY_TAGS: {
> +		struct kvm_arm_copy_mte_tags copy_tags;
> +
> +		if (copy_from_user(&copy_tags, argp, sizeof(copy_tags)))
> +			return -EFAULT;
> +		return kvm_vm_ioctl_mte_copy_tags(kvm, &copy_tags);
> +	}
>  	default:
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
> index 5cb4a1cd5603..4ddb20017b2f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
> @@ -995,3 +995,85 @@ int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_has_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  
>  	return ret;
>  }
> +
> +long kvm_vm_ioctl_mte_copy_tags(struct kvm *kvm,
> +				struct kvm_arm_copy_mte_tags *copy_tags)
> +{
> +	gpa_t guest_ipa = copy_tags->guest_ipa;
> +	size_t length = copy_tags->length;
> +	void __user *tags = copy_tags->addr;
> +	gpa_t gfn;
> +	bool write = !(copy_tags->flags & KVM_ARM_TAGS_FROM_GUEST);
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	if (!kvm_has_mte(kvm))
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (copy_tags->reserved[0] || copy_tags->reserved[1])
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (copy_tags->flags & ~KVM_ARM_TAGS_FROM_GUEST)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (length & ~PAGE_MASK || guest_ipa & ~PAGE_MASK)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	gfn = gpa_to_gfn(guest_ipa);
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&kvm->slots_lock);
> +
> +	while (length > 0) {
> +		kvm_pfn_t pfn = gfn_to_pfn_prot(kvm, gfn, write, NULL);
> +		void *maddr;
> +		unsigned long num_tags;
> +		struct page *page;
> +
> +		if (is_error_noslot_pfn(pfn)) {
> +			ret = -EFAULT;
> +			goto out;
> +		}
> +
> +		page = pfn_to_online_page(pfn);
> +		if (!page) {
> +			/* Reject ZONE_DEVICE memory */
> +			ret = -EFAULT;
> +			goto out;
> +		}
> +		maddr = page_address(page);
> +
> +		if (!write) {
> +			if (test_bit(PG_mte_tagged, &page->flags))
> +				num_tags = mte_copy_tags_to_user(tags, maddr,
> +							MTE_GRANULES_PER_PAGE);
> +			else
> +				/* No tags in memory, so write zeros */
> +				num_tags = MTE_GRANULES_PER_PAGE -
> +					clear_user(tags, MTE_GRANULES_PER_PAGE);
> +			kvm_release_pfn_clean(pfn);
> +		} else {
> +			num_tags = mte_copy_tags_from_user(maddr, tags,
> +							MTE_GRANULES_PER_PAGE);
> +			kvm_release_pfn_dirty(pfn);
> +		}
> +
> +		if (num_tags != MTE_GRANULES_PER_PAGE) {
> +			ret = -EFAULT;
> +			goto out;
> +		}
> +
> +		/* Set the flag after checking the write completed fully */
> +		if (write)
> +			set_bit(PG_mte_tagged, &page->flags);

This ended up catching my eye as I was merging some other patches.

This set_bit() occurs *after* the page has been released, meaning it
could have been evicted and reused in the interval. I plan to fix it
as below. Please let me know if that works for you.

Thanks,

	M.