Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] locking/lockdep: Print possible warning after counting deps

[Boqun Feng]

On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 10:55:34PM +0800, Xiongwei Song wrote:
> From: Xiongwei Song <sxwjean@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> The graph walk might hit error when counting dependencies. Once the
> return value is negative, print a warning to reminder users.
> 
> However, lockdep_unlock() would be called twice if we call print_bfs_bug()
> directly in __lockdep_count_*_deps(), so as the suggestion from Boqun:
> "
> Here print_bfs_bug() will eventually call debug_locks_off_graph_unlock()
> to release the graph lock, and the caller (lockdep_count_fowards_deps())
> will also call graph_unlock() afterwards, and that means we unlock
> *twice* if a BFS error happens... although in that case, lockdep should
> stop working so messing up with the graph lock may not hurt anything,
> but still, I don't think we want to do that.
> 
> So probably you can open-code __lockdep_count_forward_deps() into
> lockdep_count_forwards_deps(), and call print_bfs_bug() or
> graph_unlock() accordingly. The body of __lockdep_count_forward_deps()
> is really small, so I think it's OK to open-code it into its caller.
> "
> we put the code in __lockdep_count_*_deps() into lockdep_count_*_deps().
> 
> Suggested-by: Waiman Long <longman@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Suggested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Xiongwei Song <sxwjean@xxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx>

Thanks!

Regards,
Boqun

> ---
>  kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> index cb94097014d8..c29453b1df50 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> @@ -2024,55 +2024,52 @@ static bool noop_count(struct lock_list *entry, void *data)
>  	return false;
>  }
>  
> -static unsigned long __lockdep_count_forward_deps(struct lock_list *this)
> -{
> -	unsigned long  count = 0;
> -	struct lock_list *target_entry;
> -
> -	__bfs_forwards(this, (void *)&count, noop_count, NULL, &target_entry);
> -
> -	return count;
> -}
>  unsigned long lockdep_count_forward_deps(struct lock_class *class)
>  {
> -	unsigned long ret, flags;
> +	unsigned long count = 0, flags;
>  	struct lock_list this;
> +	struct lock_list *target_entry;
> +	enum bfs_result result;
>  
>  	__bfs_init_root(&this, class);
>  
>  	raw_local_irq_save(flags);
>  	lockdep_lock();
> -	ret = __lockdep_count_forward_deps(&this);
> -	lockdep_unlock();
> -	raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
>  
> -	return ret;
> -}
> +	result = __bfs_forwards(&this, (void *)&count, noop_count, NULL, &target_entry);
>  
> -static unsigned long __lockdep_count_backward_deps(struct lock_list *this)
> -{
> -	unsigned long  count = 0;
> -	struct lock_list *target_entry;
> +	if (bfs_error(result))
> +		print_bfs_bug(result);
> +	else
> +		lockdep_unlock();
>  
> -	__bfs_backwards(this, (void *)&count, noop_count, NULL, &target_entry);
> +	raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
>  
>  	return count;
>  }
>  
>  unsigned long lockdep_count_backward_deps(struct lock_class *class)
>  {
> -	unsigned long ret, flags;
> +	unsigned long  count = 0, flags;
>  	struct lock_list this;
> +	struct lock_list *target_entry;
> +	enum bfs_result result;
>  
>  	__bfs_init_root(&this, class);
>  
>  	raw_local_irq_save(flags);
>  	lockdep_lock();
> -	ret = __lockdep_count_backward_deps(&this);
> -	lockdep_unlock();
> +
> +	result = __bfs_backwards(&this, (void *)&count, noop_count, NULL, &target_entry);
> +
> +	if (bfs_error(result))
> +		print_bfs_bug(result);
> +	else
> +		lockdep_unlock();
> +
>  	raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
>  
> -	return ret;
> +	return count;
>  }
>  
>  /*
> -- 
> 2.30.2
>