[PATCH RFC 3/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add and use static helper function arm_smmu_get_cmdq()
From: Zhen Lei
Date: Sat Jun 26 2021 - 07:02:58 EST
One SMMU has only one normal CMDQ. Therefore, this CMDQ is used regardless
of the core on which the command is inserted. It can be referenced
directly through "smmu->cmdq". However, one SMMU has multiple ECMDQs, and
the ECMDQ used by the core on which the command insertion is executed may
be different. So the helper function arm_smmu_get_cmdq() is added, which
returns the CMDQ/ECMDQ that the current core should use. Currently, the
code that supports ECMDQ is not added. just simply returns "&smmu->cmdq".
Many subfunctions of arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist() use "&smmu->cmdq" or
"&smmu->cmdq.q" directly. To support ECMDQ, they need to call the newly
added function arm_smmu_get_cmdq() instead.
Note that normal CMDQ is still required until ECMDQ is available.
Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 22 ++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
index a5361153ca1d6a4..e4af13b1e7fc015 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
@@ -335,10 +335,14 @@ static int arm_smmu_cmdq_build_cmd(u64 *cmd, struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent *ent)
return 0;
}
+static struct arm_smmu_cmdq *arm_smmu_get_cmdq(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
+{
+ return &smmu->cmdq;
+}
+
static void arm_smmu_cmdq_build_sync_cmd(u64 *cmd, struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
- u32 prod)
+ struct arm_smmu_queue *q, u32 prod)
{
- struct arm_smmu_queue *q = &smmu->cmdq.q;
struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent ent = {
.opcode = CMDQ_OP_CMD_SYNC,
};
@@ -578,7 +582,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_not_full(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
{
unsigned long flags;
struct arm_smmu_queue_poll qp;
- struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq = &smmu->cmdq;
+ struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq = arm_smmu_get_cmdq(smmu);
int ret = 0;
/*
@@ -594,7 +598,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_not_full(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
queue_poll_init(smmu, &qp);
do {
- llq->val = READ_ONCE(smmu->cmdq.q.llq.val);
+ llq->val = READ_ONCE(cmdq->q.llq.val);
if (!queue_full(llq))
break;
@@ -613,7 +617,7 @@ static int __arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_msi(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
{
int ret = 0;
struct arm_smmu_queue_poll qp;
- struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq = &smmu->cmdq;
+ struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq = arm_smmu_get_cmdq(smmu);
u32 *cmd = (u32 *)(Q_ENT(&cmdq->q, llq->prod));
queue_poll_init(smmu, &qp);
@@ -636,12 +640,12 @@ static int __arm_smmu_cmdq_poll_until_consumed(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
struct arm_smmu_ll_queue *llq)
{
struct arm_smmu_queue_poll qp;
- struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq = &smmu->cmdq;
+ struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq = arm_smmu_get_cmdq(smmu);
u32 prod = llq->prod;
int ret = 0;
queue_poll_init(smmu, &qp);
- llq->val = READ_ONCE(smmu->cmdq.q.llq.val);
+ llq->val = READ_ONCE(cmdq->q.llq.val);
do {
if (queue_consumed(llq, prod))
break;
@@ -731,7 +735,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
u32 prod;
unsigned long flags;
bool owner;
- struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq = &smmu->cmdq;
+ struct arm_smmu_cmdq *cmdq = arm_smmu_get_cmdq(smmu);
struct arm_smmu_ll_queue llq = {
.max_n_shift = cmdq->q.llq.max_n_shift,
}, head = llq;
@@ -771,7 +775,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
arm_smmu_cmdq_write_entries(cmdq, cmds, llq.prod, n);
if (sync) {
prod = queue_inc_prod_n(&llq, n);
- arm_smmu_cmdq_build_sync_cmd(cmd_sync, smmu, prod);
+ arm_smmu_cmdq_build_sync_cmd(cmd_sync, smmu, &cmdq->q, prod);
queue_write(Q_ENT(&cmdq->q, prod), cmd_sync, CMDQ_ENT_DWORDS);
/*
--
2.26.0.106.g9fadedd