Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
On SMP, setup_kuep() is also called from start_secondary() since
commit 86f46f343272 ("powerpc/32s: Initialise KUAP and KUEP in C").
start_secondary() is not an __init function.
Remove the __init marker from setup_kuep() and bail out when
not caller on the first CPU as the work is already done.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: 10248dcba120 ("powerpc/44x: Implement Kernel Userspace Exec Protection (KUEP)")
Fixes: 86f46f343272 ("powerpc/32s: Initialise KUAP and KUEP in C").
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/powerpc/mm/nohash/44x.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/nohash/44x.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/nohash/44x.c
index 7da6d1e9fc9b..20c18bd5b9a0 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/nohash/44x.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/nohash/44x.c
@@ -241,8 +241,11 @@ void __init mmu_init_secondary(int cpu)
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_KUEP
-void __init setup_kuep(bool disabled)
+void setup_kuep(bool disabled)
{
+ if (smp_processor_id() != boot_cpuid)
+ return;
+
if (disabled)
patch_instruction_site(&patch__tlb_44x_kuep, ppc_inst(PPC_RAW_NOP()));
else
Building ppc44x_defconfig gives me:
/linux/arch/powerpc/mm/nohash/44x.c: In function 'setup_kuep':
/linux/arch/powerpc/mm/nohash/44x.c:246:35: error: 'boot_cpuid' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'boot_cpu_init'?
246 | if (smp_processor_id() != boot_cpuid)
| ^~~~~~~~~~
| boot_cpu_init
/linux/arch/powerpc/mm/nohash/44x.c:246:35: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in