I got you. I would agree, direct comparison is error-prone. (10M is impacted)
Yes, 18874368ns > 3145728ns.
But, 0xe40 < 0x1003.
So, the final lat_enc is 0xe40.
(Latency encoded is less than maximum LTR encoded by platform)
Neftin, Sasha <sasha.neftin@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:sasha.neftin@xxxxxxxxx>> 于 2021年6月29日周二 22:49写道:
On 6/29/2021 11:21, YeeLi wrote:
Yeeli,
> In e1000e driver, a PCIe-like device, the max snoop/no-snoop latency
> is the upper limit.So, directly compare the size of lat_enc and
> max_ltr_enc is incorrect.
>
why?
> In 1000Mbps, 0x8b9 < 0x1003, 189440 ns < 3145728 ns, correct.
>
> In 100Mbps, 0xc3a < 0x1003, 1900544 ns < 3145728 ns, correct.
>
> In 10Mbps, 0xe40 < 0x1003, 18874368 > 3145728, incorrect.
>
Platform LTR encoded is 0x1003 - right. It is meant 1048576ns x 3 =
3145738ns.
Now,
for 1000M: 0x08b9 => 185ns x 1024 = 189440ns (you are correct)
for 100M: 0x0c3a => 58ns x 32768 = 1900544ns (correct)
for 10M: 0x0e41 => 577ns x 32768 = 18907136ns (ok?)
18907136ns > 3145738ns, (latency encoded is great than maximum LTR
encoded by platform) - so, there is no point to wait more than platform
required, and lat_enc=max_ltr_enc. It is expected and we sent right
value to the power management controller.
What is the problem you try solve?
> Decoded the lat_enc and max_ltr_enc before compare them is necessary.
>
> Signed-off-by: YeeLi <seven.yi.lee@xxxxxxxxx
<mailto:seven.yi.lee@xxxxxxxxx>>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ich8lan.c | 23
++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ich8lan.c
b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ich8lan.c
> index 590ad110d383..3bff1b570b76 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ich8lan.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/ich8lan.c
> @@ -986,6 +986,27 @@ static s32 e1000_k1_workaround_lpt_lp(struct
e1000_hw *hw, bool link)
> return ret_val;
> }
>
> +static u32 convert_e1000e_ltr_scale(u32 val)
> +{
> + if (val > 5)
> + return 0;
> +
> + return 1U << (5 * val);
> +}
> +
> +static u64 decoded_ltr(u32 val)
> +{
> + u64 decoded_latency;
> + u32 value;
> + u32 scale;
> +
> + value = val & 0x03FF;
> + scale = (val & 0x1C00) >> 10;
> + decoded_latency = value * convert_e1000e_ltr_scale(scale);
> +
> + return decoded_latency;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * e1000_platform_pm_pch_lpt - Set platform power management
values
> * @hw: pointer to the HW structure
> @@ -1059,7 +1080,7 @@ static s32 e1000_platform_pm_pch_lpt(struct
e1000_hw *hw, bool link)
> E1000_PCI_LTR_CAP_LPT + 2,
&max_nosnoop);
> max_ltr_enc = max_t(u16, max_snoop, max_nosnoop);
>
> - if (lat_enc > max_ltr_enc)
> + if (decoded_ltr(lat_enc) > decoded_ltr(max_ltr_enc))
> lat_enc = max_ltr_enc;
> }
>
>
sasha