Re: [PATCH] riscv: Fix 32-bit RISC-V boot failure

[Kefeng Wang]

On 2021/6/30 19:58, Bin Meng wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 11:21 AM Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 10:28 AM Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On 2021/6/28 9:15, Bin Meng wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 8:53 AM Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > > Hi， sorry for the mistake，the bug is fixed by
> > > > >
> > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20210602085517.127481-2-wangkefeng.wang@xxxxxxxxxx/
> > > > What are we on the patch you mentioned?
> > > >
> > > > I don't see it applied in the linux/master.
> > > >
> > > > Also there should be a "Fixes" tag and stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx cc'ed
> > > > because 32-bit is broken since v5.12.
> > > https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/riscv/linux/+/c9811e379b211c67ba29fb09d6f644dd44cfcff2
> > >
> > > it's on Palmer' riscv-next.
> > Not sure riscv-next is for which release? This is a regression and
> > should be on 5.13.
> >
> > > Hi Palmer, should I resend or could you help me to add the fixes tag?
> Your patch mixed 2 things (fix plus one feature) together, so it is
> not proper to back port your patch.

"mem=" will change the range of memblock, so the fix part must be included.


> Here is my 2 cents:
>
> 1. Drop your patch from riscv-next
> 2. Apply my patch as it is a simple fix to previous commit. This
> allows stable kernel to cherry-pick the fix to v5.12 and v5.13.
> 3. Rebase your patch against mine, and resend v2
>
> Let me know if this makes sense.

It is not a big problem for me, but I have no right abourt riscv-next,

let's wait Palmer's advise.

> Regards,
> Bin
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv