[syzbot] possible deadlock in __loop_clr_fd (2)

From: syzbot
Date: Wed Jul 07 2021 - 21:27:20 EST

Next message: Jin Yao: "[PATCH v2 1/4] perf pmu: Skip invalid hybrid pmu"
Previous message: Andrew Lunn: "Re: [PATCH net] net: phy: reconfigure PHY WOL in resume if WOL option still enabled"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hello,

syzbot found the following issue on:

HEAD commit: 3dbdb38e Merge branch 'for-5.14' of git://git.kernel.org/p..
git tree: upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=121231c4300000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=a1fcf15a09815757
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=f61766d5763f9e7a118f

Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+f61766d5763f9e7a118f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.13.0-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor.4/28137 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88801fddc138 ((wq_completion)loop7){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: flush_workqueue+0xe1/0x1600 kernel/workqueue.c:2784

but task is already holding lock:
ffff88801e95b468 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x95/0x1550 drivers/block/loop.c:1286

which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #6 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:959 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x12a/0x10a0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1104
loop_control_ioctl drivers/block/loop.c:2427 [inline]
loop_control_ioctl+0x20f/0x480 drivers/block/loop.c:2403
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:1069 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:1055 [inline]
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:1055
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

-> #5 (loop_ctl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:959 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x12a/0x10a0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1104
loop_probe+0xc7/0x150 drivers/block/loop.c:2397
blk_request_module+0x111/0x1d0 block/genhd.c:660
blkdev_get_no_open+0x1d5/0x250 fs/block_dev.c:1332
blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x25/0xdd0 fs/block_dev.c:1395
blkdev_get_by_dev+0x6b/0x80 fs/block_dev.c:1448
swsusp_check+0x4d/0x270 kernel/power/swap.c:1525
software_resume.part.0+0x102/0x1f0 kernel/power/hibernate.c:974
software_resume kernel/power/hibernate.c:84 [inline]
resume_store+0x147/0x170 kernel/power/hibernate.c:1176
kobj_attr_store+0x50/0x80 lib/kobject.c:856
sysfs_kf_write+0x110/0x160 fs/sysfs/file.c:139
kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x342/0x500 fs/kernfs/file.c:296
call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2114 [inline]
new_sync_write+0x426/0x650 fs/read_write.c:518
vfs_write+0x796/0xa30 fs/read_write.c:605
ksys_write+0x12d/0x250 fs/read_write.c:658
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

-> #4 (major_names_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:959 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x12a/0x10a0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1104
blkdev_show+0x27/0x160 block/genhd.c:179
devinfo_show+0xc1/0xf0 fs/proc/devices.c:22
seq_read_iter+0xb58/0x11e0 fs/seq_file.c:269
proc_reg_read_iter+0x1fb/0x2d0 fs/proc/inode.c:300
call_read_iter include/linux/fs.h:2108 [inline]
new_sync_read+0x41e/0x6e0 fs/read_write.c:415
vfs_read+0x35c/0x570 fs/read_write.c:496
ksys_read+0x12d/0x250 fs/read_write.c:634
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

-> #3 (&p->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:959 [inline]
__mutex_lock+0x12a/0x10a0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1104
seq_read_iter+0xdf/0x11e0 fs/seq_file.c:179
proc_reg_read_iter+0x1fb/0x2d0 fs/proc/inode.c:300
call_read_iter include/linux/fs.h:2108 [inline]
generic_file_splice_read+0x450/0x6c0 fs/splice.c:311
do_splice_to+0x1bf/0x250 fs/splice.c:796
splice_direct_to_actor+0x2c2/0x8c0 fs/splice.c:870
do_splice_direct+0x1b3/0x280 fs/splice.c:979
do_sendfile+0x9f0/0x1110 fs/read_write.c:1260
__do_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1325 [inline]
__se_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1311 [inline]
__x64_sys_sendfile64+0x1cc/0x210 fs/read_write.c:1311
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

-> #2 (sb_writers#3){.+.+}-{0:0}:
percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline]
__sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1763 [inline]
sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1833 [inline]
file_start_write include/linux/fs.h:3034 [inline]
lo_write_bvec+0x3ed/0x6c0 drivers/block/loop.c:286
lo_write_simple drivers/block/loop.c:309 [inline]
do_req_filebacked drivers/block/loop.c:627 [inline]
loop_handle_cmd drivers/block/loop.c:2140 [inline]
loop_process_work+0xc60/0x24e0 drivers/block/loop.c:2180
process_one_work+0x98d/0x1630 kernel/workqueue.c:2276
worker_thread+0x658/0x11f0 kernel/workqueue.c:2422
kthread+0x3e5/0x4d0 kernel/kthread.c:319
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:295

-> #1 ((work_completion)(&lo->rootcg_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:
process_one_work+0x8fc/0x1630 kernel/workqueue.c:2252
worker_thread+0x658/0x11f0 kernel/workqueue.c:2422
kthread+0x3e5/0x4d0 kernel/kthread.c:319
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:295

-> #0 ((wq_completion)loop7){+.+.}-{0:0}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3051 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3174 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3789 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x2a07/0x54a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5015
lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5625 [inline]
lock_acquire+0x1ab/0x510 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5590
flush_workqueue+0x110/0x1600 kernel/workqueue.c:2787
drain_workqueue+0x1a5/0x3c0 kernel/workqueue.c:2952
destroy_workqueue+0x71/0x800 kernel/workqueue.c:4383
__loop_clr_fd+0x1f8/0x1550 drivers/block/loop.c:1304
loop_clr_fd drivers/block/loop.c:1430 [inline]
lo_ioctl+0x3c3/0x1600 drivers/block/loop.c:1788
blkdev_ioctl+0x2a1/0x6d0 block/ioctl.c:585
block_ioctl+0xf9/0x140 fs/block_dev.c:1602
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:1069 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:1055 [inline]
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:1055
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

other info that might help us debug this:

Chain exists of:
(wq_completion)loop7 --> loop_ctl_mutex --> &lo->lo_mutex

Possible unsafe locking scenario:

CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&lo->lo_mutex);
lock(loop_ctl_mutex);
lock(&lo->lo_mutex);
lock((wq_completion)loop7);

*** DEADLOCK ***

1 lock held by syz-executor.4/28137:
#0: ffff88801e95b468 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x95/0x1550 drivers/block/loop.c:1286

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 28137 Comm: syz-executor.4 Not tainted 5.13.0-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:79 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0xcd/0x134 lib/dump_stack.c:96
check_noncircular+0x25f/0x2e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2131
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3051 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3174 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3789 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x2a07/0x54a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5015
lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5625 [inline]
lock_acquire+0x1ab/0x510 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5590
flush_workqueue+0x110/0x1600 kernel/workqueue.c:2787
drain_workqueue+0x1a5/0x3c0 kernel/workqueue.c:2952
destroy_workqueue+0x71/0x800 kernel/workqueue.c:4383
__loop_clr_fd+0x1f8/0x1550 drivers/block/loop.c:1304
loop_clr_fd drivers/block/loop.c:1430 [inline]
lo_ioctl+0x3c3/0x1600 drivers/block/loop.c:1788
blkdev_ioctl+0x2a1/0x6d0 block/ioctl.c:585
block_ioctl+0xf9/0x140 fs/block_dev.c:1602
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:1069 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:1055 [inline]
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:1055
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x4665d9
Code: ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 bc ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007fc7e175f188 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000056c0f0 RCX: 00000000004665d9
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000004c01 RDI: 0000000000000004
RBP: 00000000004bfcb9 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000000000056c0f0
R13: 0000000000a9fb1f R14: 00007fc7e175f300 R15: 0000000000022000

---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.

syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.

Next message: Jin Yao: "[PATCH v2 1/4] perf pmu: Skip invalid hybrid pmu"
Previous message: Andrew Lunn: "Re: [PATCH net] net: phy: reconfigure PHY WOL in resume if WOL option still enabled"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]