RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] Documentation/bindings: phy: update references to cp11x

[Kostya Porotchkin]

Hi, Russell,

No problem, we can drop it. This patch is not an absolutely necessary one.
We just tried to keep the documentation clean.

Regards
Kosta

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Russell King <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, July 8, 2021 14:31
> To: Kostya Porotchkin <kostap@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx; kishon@xxxxxx; vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx;
> robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; andrew@xxxxxxx; gregory.clement@xxxxxxxxxxx;
> sebastian.hesselbarth@xxxxxxxxx; vladimir.vid@xxxxxxxxxx;
> luka.kovacic@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-phy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; mw@xxxxxxxxxxxx; jaz@xxxxxxxxxxxx; Nadav
> Haklai <nadavh@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Stefan Chulski <stefanc@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Ben
> Peled <bpeled@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] Documentation/bindings: phy: update
> references to cp11x
> 
> External Email
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 02:25:24PM +0300, kostap@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > From: Grzegorz Jaszczyk <jaz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > The cp11x references in dts has changed, reflect it in comphy
> > documentation.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Grzegorz Jaszczyk <jaz@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Konstantin Porotchkin <kostap@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> I don't think it's really necessary to reflect the syntactic sugar that gets used
> to cope with the fact we have two CP11x dies in the DT examples. They are
> exactly that - an example of the usage. They don't need to reflect reality.
> 
> --
> RMK's Patch system: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
> 3A__www.armlinux.org.uk_developer_patches_&d=DwIBAg&c=nKjWec2b6R0
> mOyPaz7xtfQ&r=-
> N9sN4p5NSr0JGQoQ_2UCOgAqajG99W1EbSOww0WU8o&m=8YiUSNpFqlwKlD
> nf3QTGe2_zTXQ_qyiXoSj1RIkXuY4&s=JjkSKqB5ZgxxFXzzx098Zw9w2NT28SuQC
> KUItzqNpv4&e=
> FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!