[PATCH 02/13] ACPI: CPPC: Fix doxygen comments

From: Sudeep Holla
Date: Thu Jul 08 2021 - 14:09:05 EST


Clang complains about doxygen comments too with W=1 in the build.

| drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c:560: warning: Function parameter or member
| 'pcc_ss_id' not described in 'pcc_data_alloc'
| drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c:1343: warning: Function parameter or member
| 'cpu_num' not described in 'cppc_get_transition_latency'

Fix it.

Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
index a4d4eebba1da..eb5685167d19 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
@@ -562,6 +562,8 @@ bool __weak cpc_ffh_supported(void)
/**
* pcc_data_alloc() - Allocate the pcc_data memory for pcc subspace
*
+ * @pcc_ss_id: PCC Subspace channel identifier
+ *
* Check and allocate the cppc_pcc_data memory.
* In some processor configurations it is possible that same subspace
* is shared between multiple CPUs. This is seen especially in CPUs
@@ -1347,10 +1349,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cppc_set_perf);
/**
* cppc_get_transition_latency - returns frequency transition latency in ns
*
+ * @cpu_num: Logical index of the CPU for which latencty is requested
+ *
* ACPI CPPC does not explicitly specify how a platform can specify the
* transition latency for performance change requests. The closest we have
* is the timing information from the PCCT tables which provides the info
* on the number and frequency of PCC commands the platform can handle.
+ *
+ * Returns: frequency transition latency on success or CPUFREQ_ETERNAL on
+ * failure
*/
unsigned int cppc_get_transition_latency(int cpu_num)
{
--
2.25.1