Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: initialize page->private when using for our internal use

From: Chao Yu
Date: Sat Jul 10 2021 - 04:13:54 EST


On 2021/7/7 17:57, Mel Gorman wrote:
I think it would work but it would be preferable to find out why the
tail page has an order set in the first place. I've looked over

Agreed.

mm/page_alloc.c and mm/compaction.c a few times and did not spot where
set_private_page(page, 0) is missed when it should be covered by
clear_page_guard or del_page_from_free_list :(

I didn't enable CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC, so we will expect page private
should be cleared by del_page_from_free_list(), but I guess it only clears
the buddy's private field rather than original page's, so I added below
diff and check the dmesg, it looks stall private value in original page
will be left commonly... Let me know if I missed something?

---
mm/page_alloc.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index a06bcfe6f786..1e7031ff548e 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -1029,6 +1029,7 @@ static inline void __free_one_page(struct page *page,
unsigned long combined_pfn;
unsigned int max_order;
struct page *buddy;
+ struct page *orig_page = page;
bool to_tail;

max_order = min_t(unsigned int, MAX_ORDER - 1, pageblock_order);
@@ -1097,6 +1098,10 @@ static inline void __free_one_page(struct page *page,

done_merging:
set_buddy_order(page, order);
+ if (orig_page != page) {
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(orig_page->private))
+ pr_info("2order:%x, origpage.private:%x", order, orig_page->private);
+ }

if (fpi_flags & FPI_TO_TAIL)
to_tail = true;
--
2.22.1