Re: [PATCH v1 5/6] software nodes: Split software_node_notify()

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 07:27:12PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Split software_node_notify_remove) out of software_node_notify()
> and make device_platform_notify() call the latter on device addition
> and the former on device removal.
> 
> While at it, put the headers of the above functions into base.h,
> because they don't need to be present in a global header file.
> 
> No intentional functional impact.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/base/base.h      |    3 ++
>  drivers/base/core.c      |    9 +++---
>  drivers/base/swnode.c    |   61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>  include/linux/property.h |    2 -
>  4 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/base/swnode.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/base/swnode.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/base/swnode.c
> @@ -11,6 +11,8 @@
>  #include <linux/property.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>  
> +#include "base.h"
> +
>  struct swnode {
>  	struct kobject kobj;
>  	struct fwnode_handle fwnode;
> @@ -1053,7 +1055,7 @@ int device_add_software_node(struct devi
>  	 * balance.
>  	 */
>  	if (device_is_registered(dev))
> -		software_node_notify(dev, KOBJ_ADD);
> +		software_node_notify(dev);

Should this now be called "software_node_notify_add()" to match up with:

>  	if (device_is_registered(dev))
> -		software_node_notify(dev, KOBJ_REMOVE);
> +		software_node_notify_remove(dev);

The other being called "_remove"?

Makes it more obvious to me :)

thanks,

greg k-h