Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] dt-bindings: clock: Add SC7280 DISPCC clock binding

[Taniya Das]

Hello Rob,

Thanks for the review.

On 5/4/2021 12:48 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 04:03:05PM +0530, Taniya Das wrote:
> > Add device tree bindings for display clock controller subsystem for
> > Qualcomm Technology Inc's SC7280 SoCs.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <tdas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   .../bindings/clock/qcom,sc7280-dispcc.yaml         | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >   include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sc7280.h     | 55 +++++++++++++
> >   2 files changed, 149 insertions(+)
> >   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sc7280-dispcc.yaml
> >   create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sc7280.h
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sc7280-dispcc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sc7280-dispcc.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..2178666
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sc7280-dispcc.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)

> > +...
> > diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sc7280.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sc7280.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..2074b30
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sc7280.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
>
> Dual license please. I'm tired of telling the company that complained to
> me about having dual licensing for DT stuff not dual license their
> stuff. Please pass that on to your coworkers.
>
> Rob
Rob, I have taken a note on this and will be taken care from the next time.

--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation.

--