Re: [PATCH v15 05/12] dmaengine: dma: imx-sdma: add fw_loaded and is_ram_script

From: Lucas Stach
Date: Tue Jul 13 2021 - 06:34:45 EST


Am Mittwoch, dem 14.07.2021 um 02:41 +0800 schrieb Robin Gong:
> Add 'fw_loaded' and 'is_ram_script' to check if the script used by channel
> is ram script and it's loaded or not, so that could prevent meaningless
> following malloc dma descriptor and bd allocate in sdma_transfer_init(),
> otherwise memory may be consumed out potentially without free in case
> that spi fallback into pio while dma transfer failed by sdma firmware not
> ready(next ERR009165 patch depends on sdma RAM scripts/firmware).
>
> Signed-off-by: Robin Gong <yibin.gong@xxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
> index 665ccbf..639a783 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
> @@ -435,6 +435,7 @@ struct sdma_channel {
> enum dma_status status;
> struct imx_dma_data data;
> struct work_struct terminate_worker;
> + bool is_ram_script;
> };
>
> #define IMX_DMA_SG_LOOP BIT(0)
> @@ -498,6 +499,7 @@ struct sdma_engine {
> struct sdma_buffer_descriptor *bd0;
> /* clock ratio for AHB:SDMA core. 1:1 is 1, 2:1 is 0*/
> bool clk_ratio;
> + bool fw_loaded;
> };
>
> static int sdma_config_write(struct dma_chan *chan,
> @@ -953,6 +955,7 @@ static void sdma_get_pc(struct sdma_channel *sdmac,
> case IMX_DMATYPE_SSI_DUAL:
> per_2_emi = sdma->script_addrs->ssish_2_mcu_addr;
> emi_2_per = sdma->script_addrs->mcu_2_ssish_addr;
> + sdmac->is_ram_script = true;
> break;
> case IMX_DMATYPE_SSI_SP:
> case IMX_DMATYPE_MMC:
> @@ -967,6 +970,7 @@ static void sdma_get_pc(struct sdma_channel *sdmac,
> per_2_emi = sdma->script_addrs->asrc_2_mcu_addr;
> emi_2_per = sdma->script_addrs->asrc_2_mcu_addr;
> per_2_per = sdma->script_addrs->per_2_per_addr;
> + sdmac->is_ram_script = true;
> break;
> case IMX_DMATYPE_ASRC_SP:
> per_2_emi = sdma->script_addrs->shp_2_mcu_addr;
> @@ -1363,6 +1367,11 @@ static struct sdma_desc *sdma_transfer_init(struct sdma_channel *sdmac,
> {
> struct sdma_desc *desc;
>
> + if (!sdmac->sdma->fw_loaded && sdmac->is_ram_script) {
> + dev_warn_once(sdmac->sdma->dev, "sdma firmware not ready!\n");
> + goto err_out;
> + }
> +
> desc = kzalloc((sizeof(*desc)), GFP_NOWAIT);
> if (!desc)
> goto err_out;
> @@ -1613,6 +1622,8 @@ static int sdma_config_write(struct dma_chan *chan,
> {
> struct sdma_channel *sdmac = to_sdma_chan(chan);
>
> + sdmac->is_ram_script = false;
> +
Again, I think this initialization should move into sdma_get_pc() to
move it into close proximity of the code where it gets overwritten to
true. This would make this flow of events much easier to see when
reading the driver code.

Regards,
Lucas

> if (direction == DMA_DEV_TO_MEM) {
> sdmac->per_address = dmaengine_cfg->src_addr;
> sdmac->watermark_level = dmaengine_cfg->src_maxburst *
> @@ -1792,6 +1803,8 @@ static void sdma_load_firmware(const struct firmware *fw, void *context)
>
> sdma_add_scripts(sdma, addr);
>
> + sdma->fw_loaded = true;
> +
> dev_info(sdma->dev, "loaded firmware %d.%d\n",
> header->version_major,
> header->version_minor);