Re: [PATCH v9 03/17] vdpa: Fix code indentation

From: Yongji Xie
Date: Wed Jul 14 2021 - 01:48:31 EST


On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 12:20 PM Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2021-07-13 at 16:46 +0800, Xie Yongji wrote:
> > Use tabs to indent the code instead of spaces.
>
> There are a lot more of these in this file.
>
> $ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --fix-inplace --strict include/linux/vdpa.h
>
> and a little typing gives:
> ---
> include/linux/vdpa.h | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/vdpa.h b/include/linux/vdpa.h
> index 3357ac98878d4..14cd4248e59fd 100644
> --- a/include/linux/vdpa.h
> +++ b/include/linux/vdpa.h
> @@ -43,17 +43,17 @@ struct vdpa_vq_state_split {
> * @last_used_idx: used index
> */
> struct vdpa_vq_state_packed {
> - u16 last_avail_counter:1;
> - u16 last_avail_idx:15;
> - u16 last_used_counter:1;
> - u16 last_used_idx:15;
> + u16 last_avail_counter:1;
> + u16 last_avail_idx:15;
> + u16 last_used_counter:1;
> + u16 last_used_idx:15;
> };
>
> struct vdpa_vq_state {
> - union {
> - struct vdpa_vq_state_split split;
> - struct vdpa_vq_state_packed packed;
> - };
> + union {
> + struct vdpa_vq_state_split split;
> + struct vdpa_vq_state_packed packed;
> + };
> };
>
> struct vdpa_mgmt_dev;
> @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ struct vdpa_iova_range {
> * @vdev: vdpa device
> * @idx: virtqueue index
> * @state: pointer to returned state (last_avail_idx)
> - * @get_vq_notification: Get the notification area for a virtqueue
> + * @get_vq_notification: Get the notification area for a virtqueue
> * @vdev: vdpa device
> * @idx: virtqueue index
> * Returns the notifcation area
> @@ -277,13 +277,13 @@ struct vdpa_device *__vdpa_alloc_device(struct device *parent,
> const struct vdpa_config_ops *config,
> size_t size, const char *name);
>
> -#define vdpa_alloc_device(dev_struct, member, parent, config, name) \
> - container_of(__vdpa_alloc_device( \
> - parent, config, \
> - sizeof(dev_struct) + \
> - BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(offsetof( \
> - dev_struct, member)), name), \
> - dev_struct, member)
> +#define vdpa_alloc_device(dev_struct, member, parent, config, name) \
> + container_of(__vdpa_alloc_device(parent, config, \
> + sizeof(dev_struct) + \
> + BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(offsetof(dev_struct, \
> + member)), \
> + name), \
> + dev_struct, member)
>
> int vdpa_register_device(struct vdpa_device *vdev, int nvqs);
> void vdpa_unregister_device(struct vdpa_device *vdev);
> @@ -308,8 +308,8 @@ struct vdpa_driver {
> int __vdpa_register_driver(struct vdpa_driver *drv, struct module *owner);
> void vdpa_unregister_driver(struct vdpa_driver *drv);
>
> -#define module_vdpa_driver(__vdpa_driver) \
> - module_driver(__vdpa_driver, vdpa_register_driver, \
> +#define module_vdpa_driver(__vdpa_driver) \
> + module_driver(__vdpa_driver, vdpa_register_driver, \
> vdpa_unregister_driver)
>
> static inline struct vdpa_driver *drv_to_vdpa(struct device_driver *driver)
> @@ -339,25 +339,25 @@ static inline struct device *vdpa_get_dma_dev(struct vdpa_device *vdev)
>
> static inline void vdpa_reset(struct vdpa_device *vdev)
> {
> - const struct vdpa_config_ops *ops = vdev->config;
> + const struct vdpa_config_ops *ops = vdev->config;
>
> vdev->features_valid = false;
> - ops->set_status(vdev, 0);
> + ops->set_status(vdev, 0);
> }
>
> static inline int vdpa_set_features(struct vdpa_device *vdev, u64 features)
> {
> - const struct vdpa_config_ops *ops = vdev->config;
> + const struct vdpa_config_ops *ops = vdev->config;
>
> vdev->features_valid = true;
> - return ops->set_features(vdev, features);
> + return ops->set_features(vdev, features);
> }
>
> -
> -static inline void vdpa_get_config(struct vdpa_device *vdev, unsigned offset,
> +static inline void vdpa_get_config(struct vdpa_device *vdev,
> + unsigned int offset,
> void *buf, unsigned int len)
> {
> - const struct vdpa_config_ops *ops = vdev->config;
> + const struct vdpa_config_ops *ops = vdev->config;
>
> /*
> * Config accesses aren't supposed to trigger before features are set.
>
>

Oh, yes. I miss that. Thanks for the reminder!

Will fix it in the next version.

Thanks,
Yongji