Re: [PATCH 2/2] mfd: mt6360: Restore error message to regmap_read failure

From: Fei Shao
Date: Fri Jul 16 2021 - 06:25:22 EST


On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 4:03 PM Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 29 Jun 2021, Fei Shao wrote:
>
> > This adds back a missing error message for better log readability.
> >
> > Fixes: e84702940613 ("mfd: mt6360: Fix flow which is used to check ic
> > exist")
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Fei Shao <fshao@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >
> > drivers/mfd/mt6360-core.c | 4 +++-
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mfd/mt6360-core.c b/drivers/mfd/mt6360-core.c
> > index 6eaa6775b888..0ff8dae4536c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mfd/mt6360-core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mfd/mt6360-core.c
> > @@ -351,8 +351,10 @@ static int mt6360_check_vendor_info(struct mt6360_ddata *ddata)
> > int ret;
> >
> > ret = regmap_read(ddata->regmap, MT6360_PMU_DEV_INFO, &info);
> > - if (ret < 0)
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + dev_err(ddata->dev, "Failed to read device info from regmap\n");
>
> I'm not fussed about this change either, but if you insist, please
> change the commit message to be a little more generic. Users don't
> care about Regmaps and developers can grep it in the source.
>
> Suggest: "Failed to fetch device information from H/W"

I think I was a bit too paranoid about this. Please ignore this as it
doesn't make much sense, and thanks both of you for the feedback. :)

Fei

>
> > return ret;
> > + }
> >
> > if ((info & CHIP_VEN_MASK) != CHIP_VEN_MT6360) {
> > dev_err(ddata->dev, "Device not supported\n");
>
> --
> Lee Jones [李琼斯]
> Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
> Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
> Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog