Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] mm, memcg: inline mem_cgroup_{charge/uncharge} to improve disabled memcg config

[Suren Baghdasaryan]

On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 2:30 PM Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 02:25:50PM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 18, 2021 at 9:56 AM Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 05:36:25PM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > > > @@ -6723,7 +6722,7 @@ static int __mem_cgroup_charge(struct page *page, struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> > > >  }
> > > >
> > > >  /**
> > > > - * mem_cgroup_charge - charge a newly allocated page to a cgroup
> > > > + * __mem_cgroup_charge - charge a newly allocated page to a cgroup
> > > >   * @page: page to charge
> > > >   * @mm: mm context of the victim
> > > >   * @gfp_mask: reclaim mode
> > >
> > > This patch conflicts with the folio work, so I'm just rebasing the
> > > folio patches on top of this, and I think this part of the patch is a
> > > mistake.  We don't want to document the __mem_cgroup_charge() function.
> > > That's an implementation detail.  This patch should instead have moved the
> > > kernel-doc to memcontrol.h and continued to document mem_cgroup_charge().
> >
> > Ack.
> > There was a v4 version of this patch:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1458907 which was picked up by
> > Andrew already. If others agree that documentation should be moved
> > into the header file then I'll gladly post another version. Or I can
> > post a separate patch moving the documentation only. Whatever works
> > best. Andrew, Michal, Johannes, WDYT?
>
> At this point, I've moved the documentation as part of the folio patch.
> I'd rather not redo that patch again ...

Ok. If you need me to redo anything please let me know.