Re: [syzbot] possible deadlock in mnt_want_write (2)

[Miklos Szeredi]

[CC: linux-intergrity]

On Tue, 15 Jun 2021 at 18:59, syzbot
<syzbot+b42fe626038981fb7bfa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> syzbot found the following issue on:
>
> HEAD commit:    06af8679 coredump: Limit what can interrupt coredumps
> git tree:       upstream
> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=162f99afd00000
> kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=547a5e42ca601229
> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=b42fe626038981fb7bfa
> compiler:       Debian clang version 11.0.1-2
>
> Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.
>
> IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
> Reported-by: syzbot+b42fe626038981fb7bfa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> ======================================================
> WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
> 5.13.0-rc5-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
> ------------------------------------------------------
> syz-executor.1/21398 is trying to acquire lock:
> ffff8881485a6460 (sb_writers#5){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write+0x3b/0x80 fs/namespace.c:375
>
> but task is already holding lock:
> ffff888034945bc0 (&iint->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: process_measurement+0x75a/0x1ba0 security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c:253
>
> which lock already depends on the new lock.
>
>
> the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
>
> -> #1 (&iint->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
>        lock_acquire+0x17f/0x720 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5512
>        __mutex_lock_common+0x1bf/0x3100 kernel/locking/mutex.c:959
>        __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:1104 [inline]
>        mutex_lock_nested+0x1a/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:1119
>        process_measurement+0x75a/0x1ba0 security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c:253
>        ima_file_check+0xe0/0x130 security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c:499
>        do_open fs/namei.c:3363 [inline]
>        path_openat+0x293d/0x39b0 fs/namei.c:3494
>        do_filp_open+0x221/0x460 fs/namei.c:3521
>        do_sys_openat2+0x124/0x460 fs/open.c:1187
>        do_sys_open fs/open.c:1203 [inline]
>        __do_sys_open fs/open.c:1211 [inline]
>        __se_sys_open fs/open.c:1207 [inline]
>        __x64_sys_open+0x221/0x270 fs/open.c:1207
>        do_syscall_64+0x3f/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:47
>        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
>
> -> #0 (sb_writers#5){.+.+}-{0:0}:
>        check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2938 [inline]
>        check_prevs_add+0x4f9/0x5b60 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3061
>        validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3676 [inline]
>        __lock_acquire+0x4307/0x6040 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4902
>        lock_acquire+0x17f/0x720 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5512
>        percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline]
>        __sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1763 [inline]
>        sb_start_write+0x4f/0x180 include/linux/fs.h:1833
>        mnt_want_write+0x3b/0x80 fs/namespace.c:375
>        ovl_maybe_copy_up+0x117/0x180 fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c:996
>        ovl_open+0xa2/0x200 fs/overlayfs/file.c:149
>        do_dentry_open+0x7cb/0x1010 fs/open.c:826
>        vfs_open fs/open.c:940 [inline]
>        dentry_open+0xc6/0x120 fs/open.c:956
>        ima_calc_file_hash+0x157/0x1b00 security/integrity/ima/ima_crypto.c:557
>        ima_collect_measurement+0x283/0x520 security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c:252
>        process_measurement+0xf79/0x1ba0 security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c:330
>        ima_file_check+0xe0/0x130 security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c:499
>        do_open fs/namei.c:3363 [inline]
>        path_openat+0x293d/0x39b0 fs/namei.c:3494
>        do_filp_open+0x221/0x460 fs/namei.c:3521
>        do_sys_openat2+0x124/0x460 fs/open.c:1187
>        do_sys_open fs/open.c:1203 [inline]
>        __do_sys_open fs/open.c:1211 [inline]
>        __se_sys_open fs/open.c:1207 [inline]
>        __x64_sys_open+0x221/0x270 fs/open.c:1207
>        do_syscall_64+0x3f/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:47
>        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
>
>  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
>
>        CPU0                    CPU1
>        ----                    ----
>   lock(&iint->mutex);
>                                lock(sb_writers#5);
>                                lock(&iint->mutex);
>   lock(sb_writers#5);
>
>  *** DEADLOCK ***
>
> 1 lock held by syz-executor.1/21398:
>  #0: ffff888034945bc0 (&iint->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: process_measurement+0x75a/0x1ba0 security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c:253
>
> stack backtrace:
> CPU: 0 PID: 21398 Comm: syz-executor.1 Not tainted 5.13.0-rc5-syzkaller #0
> Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
> Call Trace:
>  __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:79 [inline]
>  dump_stack+0x202/0x31e lib/dump_stack.c:120
>  print_circular_bug+0xb17/0xdc0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2007
>  check_noncircular+0x2cc/0x390 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2129
>  check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2938 [inline]
>  check_prevs_add+0x4f9/0x5b60 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3061
>  validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3676 [inline]
>  __lock_acquire+0x4307/0x6040 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4902
>  lock_acquire+0x17f/0x720 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5512
>  percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline]
>  __sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1763 [inline]
>  sb_start_write+0x4f/0x180 include/linux/fs.h:1833
>  mnt_want_write+0x3b/0x80 fs/namespace.c:375
>  ovl_maybe_copy_up+0x117/0x180 fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c:996
>  ovl_open+0xa2/0x200 fs/overlayfs/file.c:149
>  do_dentry_open+0x7cb/0x1010 fs/open.c:826
>  vfs_open fs/open.c:940 [inline]
>  dentry_open+0xc6/0x120 fs/open.c:956
>  ima_calc_file_hash+0x157/0x1b00 security/integrity/ima/ima_crypto.c:557
>  ima_collect_measurement+0x283/0x520 security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c:252
>  process_measurement+0xf79/0x1ba0 security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c:330
>  ima_file_check+0xe0/0x130 security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c:499
>  do_open fs/namei.c:3363 [inline]
>  path_openat+0x293d/0x39b0 fs/namei.c:3494
>  do_filp_open+0x221/0x460 fs/namei.c:3521
>  do_sys_openat2+0x124/0x460 fs/open.c:1187
>  do_sys_open fs/open.c:1203 [inline]
>  __do_sys_open fs/open.c:1211 [inline]
>  __se_sys_open fs/open.c:1207 [inline]
>  __x64_sys_open+0x221/0x270 fs/open.c:1207
>  do_syscall_64+0x3f/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:47
>  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
> RIP: 0033:0x4665d9
> Code: ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 bc ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
> RSP: 002b:00007f28cc64c188 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000002
> RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000056bf80 RCX: 00000000004665d9
> RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000003 RDI: 0000000020000200
> RBP: 00000000004bfcb9 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
> R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000000000056bf80
> R13: 00007ffdd1759cef R14: 00007f28cc64c300 R15: 0000000000022000
> overlayfs: upperdir is in-use as upperdir/workdir of another mount, mount with '-o index=off' to override exclusive upperdir protection.
>
>
> ---
> This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
> See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
> syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
>
> syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
> https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.