Re: [PATCH] x86,mm: print likely CPU at segfault time

[Rik van Riel]

On Mon, 2021-07-19 at 12:20 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:

> If it's as trivial as:
> 
>         printk(KERN_CONT " on cpu/core %d/%d",
>                 raw_smp_processor_id(),
>                 topology_core_id(raw_smp_processor_id()));
> 
> it would be handy.  But, it's also not hard to look at 10 segfaults,
> see
> that they happened only on 2 CPUs and realize that hyperthreading is
> enabled.

One problem with topology_core_id() is that that, on a
multi-socket system, the core number may not be unique.

That is why I ended up going with just the CPU number.
It's pretty easy to put one and one together afterwards.

Thanks for your quick patch review.

-- 
All Rights Reversed.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part