Re: [PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: Ingenic: Add support for new Ingenic SoCs.

From: Zhou Yanjie
Date: Sat Jul 24 2021 - 09:33:18 EST


Hi Paul,

On 2021/7/24 下午7:15, Paul Cercueil wrote:
Hi Zhou,

Le sam., juil. 24 2021 at 17:11:38 +0800, 周琰杰 (Zhou Yanjie) <zhouyanjie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
Add support for probing the ingenic_rproc driver on the JZ4760 SoC,
the JZ4760B SoC, the JZ4775 SoC, and the JZ4780 SoC from Ingenic.

Signed-off-by: 周琰杰 (Zhou Yanjie) <zhouyanjie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/ingenic_rproc.c | 115 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 91 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ingenic_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ingenic_rproc.c
index a356738..6a2e864 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/ingenic_rproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ingenic_rproc.c
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
 /*
  * Ingenic JZ47xx remoteproc driver
  * Copyright 2019, Paul Cercueil <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+ * Copyright 2021, 周琰杰 (Zhou Yanjie) <zhouyanjie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  */

 #include <linux/bitops.h>
@@ -17,7 +18,7 @@

 #define REG_AUX_CTRL        0x0
 #define REG_AUX_MSG_ACK        0x10
-#define REG_AUX_MSG        0x14
+#define REG_AUX_MSG            0x14
 #define REG_CORE_MSG_ACK    0x18
 #define REG_CORE_MSG        0x1C

@@ -32,6 +33,20 @@ module_param(auto_boot, bool, 0400);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(auto_boot,
          "Auto-boot the remote processor [default=false]");

+enum ingenic_vpu_version {
+    ID_JZ4760,
+    ID_JZ4770,
+    ID_JZ4775,
+};

The "version" field of ingenic_so_cinfo is not used anywhere, so you can drop this enum completely.


Sure, I will remove it.



+
+struct ingenic_soc_info {
+    enum ingenic_vpu_version version;
+    const struct vpu_mem_map *mem_map;
+
+    unsigned int num_clks;
+    unsigned int num_mems;
+};
+
 struct vpu_mem_map {
     const char *name;
     unsigned int da;
@@ -43,26 +58,21 @@ struct vpu_mem_info {
     void __iomem *base;
 };

-static const struct vpu_mem_map vpu_mem_map[] = {
-    { "tcsm0", 0x132b0000 },
-    { "tcsm1", 0xf4000000 },
-    { "sram",  0x132f0000 },
-};
-
 /**
  * struct vpu - Ingenic VPU remoteproc private structure
  * @irq: interrupt number
  * @clks: pointers to the VPU and AUX clocks
  * @aux_base: raw pointer to the AUX interface registers
- * @mem_info: array of struct vpu_mem_info, which contain the mapping info of
+ * @mem_info: pointers to the struct vpu_mem_info, which contain the mapping info of
  *            each of the external memories
  * @dev: private pointer to the device
  */
 struct vpu {
     int irq;
-    struct clk_bulk_data clks[2];
     void __iomem *aux_base;
-    struct vpu_mem_info mem_info[ARRAY_SIZE(vpu_mem_map)];
+    const struct ingenic_soc_info *soc_info;
+    struct clk_bulk_data *clks;
+    struct vpu_mem_info *mem_info;
     struct device *dev;
 };

@@ -72,7 +82,7 @@ static int ingenic_rproc_prepare(struct rproc *rproc)
     int ret;

     /* The clocks must be enabled for the firmware to be loaded in TCSM */
-    ret = clk_bulk_prepare_enable(ARRAY_SIZE(vpu->clks), vpu->clks);
+    ret = clk_bulk_prepare_enable(vpu->soc_info->num_clks, vpu->clks);
     if (ret)
         dev_err(vpu->dev, "Unable to start clocks: %d\n", ret);

@@ -83,7 +93,7 @@ static int ingenic_rproc_unprepare(struct rproc *rproc)
 {
     struct vpu *vpu = rproc->priv;

-    clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(ARRAY_SIZE(vpu->clks), vpu->clks);
+    clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(vpu->soc_info->num_clks, vpu->clks);

     return 0;
 }
@@ -127,7 +137,7 @@ static void *ingenic_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, size_t len, boo
     void __iomem *va = NULL;
     unsigned int i;

-    for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(vpu_mem_map); i++) {
+    for (i = 0; i < vpu->soc_info->num_mems; i++) {
         const struct vpu_mem_info *info = &vpu->mem_info[i];
         const struct vpu_mem_map *map = info->map;

@@ -163,8 +173,60 @@ static irqreturn_t vpu_interrupt(int irq, void *data)
     return rproc_vq_interrupt(rproc, vring);
 }

+static const struct vpu_mem_map jz4760_vpu_mem_map[] = {
+    { "tcsm0", 0x132b0000 },
+    { "tcsm1", 0xf4000000 },
+    { "sram",  0x132d0000 },
+};
+
+static const struct vpu_mem_map jz4770_vpu_mem_map[] = {
+    { "tcsm0", 0x132b0000 },
+    { "tcsm1", 0xf4000000 },
+    { "sram",  0x132f0000 },
+};
+
+static const struct vpu_mem_map jz4775_vpu_mem_map[] = {
+    { "tcsm",  0xf4000000 },
+    { "sram",  0x132f0000 },
+};
+
+static const struct ingenic_soc_info jz4760_soc_info = {
+    .version = ID_JZ4760,
+    .mem_map = jz4760_vpu_mem_map,
+
+    .num_clks = 2,
+    .num_mems = 3,

.num_mems = ARRAY_SIZE(jz4760_vpu_mem_map),

And the same for the other ingenic_soc_info below.


Sure.



+};
+
+static const struct ingenic_soc_info jz4770_soc_info = {
+    .version = ID_JZ4770,
+    .mem_map = jz4770_vpu_mem_map,
+
+    .num_clks = 2,
+    .num_mems = 3,
+};
+
+static const struct ingenic_soc_info jz4775_soc_info = {
+    .version = ID_JZ4775,
+    .mem_map = jz4775_vpu_mem_map,
+
+    .num_clks = 1,
+    .num_mems = 2,
+};
+
+static const struct of_device_id ingenic_rproc_of_matches[] = {
+    { .compatible = "ingenic,jz4760-vpu-rproc", .data = &jz4760_soc_info },
+    { .compatible = "ingenic,jz4760b-vpu-rproc", .data = &jz4760_soc_info },
+    { .compatible = "ingenic,jz4770-vpu-rproc", .data = &jz4770_soc_info },
+    { .compatible = "ingenic,jz4775-vpu-rproc", .data = &jz4775_soc_info },
+    { .compatible = "ingenic,jz4780-vpu-rproc", .data = &jz4775_soc_info },
+    {}
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ingenic_rproc_of_matches);
+
 static int ingenic_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
+    const struct of_device_id *id = of_match_node(ingenic_rproc_of_matches, pdev->dev.of_node);
     struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
     struct resource *mem;
     struct rproc *rproc;
@@ -181,6 +243,7 @@ static int ingenic_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)

     vpu = rproc->priv;
     vpu->dev = &pdev->dev;
+    vpu->soc_info = id->data;

Use of_device_get_match_data(dev).

Then you can get rid of the "id" variable, and you won't have to move the "ingenic_rproc_of_matches" array.


Sure, I will try.



     platform_set_drvdata(pdev, vpu);

     mem = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "aux");
@@ -190,9 +253,13 @@ static int ingenic_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
         return PTR_ERR(vpu->aux_base);
     }

-    for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(vpu_mem_map); i++) {
+    vpu->mem_info = kzalloc(sizeof(struct vpu_mem_info) * vpu->soc_info->num_mems, GFP_KERNEL);

You are leaking memory here.

Also, why not just fix the current mem_info array size to 3? That sounds way simpler.


Sure.



+    if (!vpu->mem_info)
+        return -ENOMEM;
+
+    for (i = 0; i < vpu->soc_info->num_mems; i++) {
         mem = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
-                           vpu_mem_map[i].name);
+ vpu->soc_info->mem_map[i].name);

         vpu->mem_info[i].base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, mem);
         if (IS_ERR(vpu->mem_info[i].base)) {
@@ -202,13 +269,19 @@ static int ingenic_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
         }

         vpu->mem_info[i].len = resource_size(mem);
-        vpu->mem_info[i].map = &vpu_mem_map[i];
+        vpu->mem_info[i].map = &vpu->soc_info->mem_map[i];
     }

+    vpu->clks = kzalloc(sizeof(struct clk_bulk_data) * vpu->soc_info->num_clks, GFP_KERNEL);

Same here, the "clks" array is already size 2, so it won't be a problem if you have only one clock. No need to alloc "clks" dynamically.


Sure.



+    if (!vpu->clks)
+        return -ENOMEM;
+
     vpu->clks[0].id = "vpu";
-    vpu->clks[1].id = "aux";

-    ret = devm_clk_bulk_get(dev, ARRAY_SIZE(vpu->clks), vpu->clks);
+    if (vpu->soc_info->version == ID_JZ4770)
+        vpu->clks[1].id = "aux";
+
+    ret = devm_clk_bulk_get(dev, vpu->soc_info->num_clks, vpu->clks);
     if (ret) {
         dev_err(dev, "Failed to get clocks\n");
         return ret;
@@ -235,12 +308,6 @@ static int ingenic_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
     return 0;
 }

-static const struct of_device_id ingenic_rproc_of_matches[] = {
-    { .compatible = "ingenic,jz4770-vpu-rproc", },
-    {}
-};
-MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ingenic_rproc_of_matches);

As I wrote above - you don't need to move this.


Sure.


Thanks and best regards!



Cheers,
-Paul

-
 static struct platform_driver ingenic_rproc_driver = {
     .probe = ingenic_rproc_probe,
     .driver = {
--
2.7.4