[PATCH 12/12] nfc: constify nfc_digital_ops

From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Date: Sat Jul 24 2021 - 17:50:16 EST


Neither the core nor the drivers modify the passed pointer to struct
nfc_digital_ops, so make it a pointer to const for correctness and safety.

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/nfc/nfcsim.c | 2 +-
drivers/nfc/port100.c | 2 +-
drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c | 2 +-
drivers/nfc/trf7970a.c | 2 +-
include/net/nfc/digital.h | 4 ++--
net/nfc/digital_core.c | 2 +-
6 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nfc/nfcsim.c b/drivers/nfc/nfcsim.c
index a9864fcdfba6..143dc49b815b 100644
--- a/drivers/nfc/nfcsim.c
+++ b/drivers/nfc/nfcsim.c
@@ -320,7 +320,7 @@ static int nfcsim_tg_listen(struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev, u16 timeout,
return nfcsim_send(ddev, NULL, timeout, cb, arg);
}

-static struct nfc_digital_ops nfcsim_digital_ops = {
+static const struct nfc_digital_ops nfcsim_digital_ops = {
.in_configure_hw = nfcsim_in_configure_hw,
.in_send_cmd = nfcsim_in_send_cmd,

diff --git a/drivers/nfc/port100.c b/drivers/nfc/port100.c
index 1d614f9d864a..ccb5c5fab905 100644
--- a/drivers/nfc/port100.c
+++ b/drivers/nfc/port100.c
@@ -1463,7 +1463,7 @@ static int port100_listen(struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev, u16 timeout,
return port100_tg_send_cmd(ddev, skb, timeout, cb, arg);
}

-static struct nfc_digital_ops port100_digital_ops = {
+static const struct nfc_digital_ops port100_digital_ops = {
.in_configure_hw = port100_in_configure_hw,
.in_send_cmd = port100_in_send_cmd,

diff --git a/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c b/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c
index 2dc788c363fd..993818742570 100644
--- a/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c
@@ -1037,7 +1037,7 @@ static void st95hf_abort_cmd(struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev)
{
}

-static struct nfc_digital_ops st95hf_nfc_digital_ops = {
+static const struct nfc_digital_ops st95hf_nfc_digital_ops = {
.in_configure_hw = st95hf_in_configure_hw,
.in_send_cmd = st95hf_in_send_cmd,

diff --git a/drivers/nfc/trf7970a.c b/drivers/nfc/trf7970a.c
index 33978022ae47..1aed44629aaa 100644
--- a/drivers/nfc/trf7970a.c
+++ b/drivers/nfc/trf7970a.c
@@ -1861,7 +1861,7 @@ static void trf7970a_abort_cmd(struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev)
mutex_unlock(&trf->lock);
}

-static struct nfc_digital_ops trf7970a_nfc_ops = {
+static const struct nfc_digital_ops trf7970a_nfc_ops = {
.in_configure_hw = trf7970a_in_configure_hw,
.in_send_cmd = trf7970a_send_cmd,
.tg_configure_hw = trf7970a_tg_configure_hw,
diff --git a/include/net/nfc/digital.h b/include/net/nfc/digital.h
index 963db96bcbbb..bb3e8fdc0692 100644
--- a/include/net/nfc/digital.h
+++ b/include/net/nfc/digital.h
@@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ struct digital_poll_tech {

struct nfc_digital_dev {
struct nfc_dev *nfc_dev;
- struct nfc_digital_ops *ops;
+ const struct nfc_digital_ops *ops;

u32 protocols;

@@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ struct nfc_digital_dev {
void (*skb_add_crc)(struct sk_buff *skb);
};

-struct nfc_digital_dev *nfc_digital_allocate_device(struct nfc_digital_ops *ops,
+struct nfc_digital_dev *nfc_digital_allocate_device(const struct nfc_digital_ops *ops,
__u32 supported_protocols,
__u32 driver_capabilities,
int tx_headroom,
diff --git a/net/nfc/digital_core.c b/net/nfc/digital_core.c
index 8f2572decccd..fefc03674f4f 100644
--- a/net/nfc/digital_core.c
+++ b/net/nfc/digital_core.c
@@ -745,7 +745,7 @@ static const struct nfc_ops digital_nfc_ops = {
.im_transceive = digital_in_send,
};

-struct nfc_digital_dev *nfc_digital_allocate_device(struct nfc_digital_ops *ops,
+struct nfc_digital_dev *nfc_digital_allocate_device(const struct nfc_digital_ops *ops,
__u32 supported_protocols,
__u32 driver_capabilities,
int tx_headroom, int tx_tailroom)
--
2.27.0