Re: [PATCH 0/8] all: use find_next_*_bit() instead of find_first_*_bit() where possible

[Yury Norov]

On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 09:06:18AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-07-28 at 08:55 -0700, Yury Norov wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 08:13:32AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2021-07-28 at 08:00 -0700, Yury Norov wrote:
> > > > Ping again.
> > > > 
> > > > The rebased series together with other bitmap patches can be found
> > > > here:
> > > > 
> > > > https://github.com/norov/linux/tree/bitmap-20210716
> > > []
> > > > >  .../bitops => include/linux}/find.h           | 149 +++++++++++++++++-
> > > 
> > > A file named find.h in a directory named bitops seems relatively sensible,
> > > but a bitops specific file named find.h in include/linux does not.
> >  
> > 
> > I'm OK with any name, it's not supposed to be included directly. What
> > do you think about bitmap_find.h, or can you suggest a better name?
> 
> Dunno.
> 
> But I'm a bit curious about the duplicate function naming (conflicts?)
> with functions in include/linux/bitmap.h

What names duplicate?