Re: [RFC 1/4] dma-fence: Add deadline awareness

From: Daniel Vetter
Date: Thu Jul 29 2021 - 03:03:40 EST

Next message: Frank Wunderlich: "[PATCH v2] soc: mmsys: mediatek: add mask to mmsys routes"
Previous message: Daniel Vetter: "Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm: use the lookup lock in drm_is_current_master"
In reply to: Rob Clark: "Re: [RFC 1/4] dma-fence: Add deadline awareness"
Next in thread: Rob Clark: "Re: [RFC 1/4] dma-fence: Add deadline awareness"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 10:58:51AM -0700, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 10:23 AM Christian König
> <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Am 28.07.21 um 17:15 schrieb Rob Clark:
> > > On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 4:37 AM Christian König
> > > <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >> Am 28.07.21 um 09:03 schrieb Christian König:
> > >>> Am 27.07.21 um 16:25 schrieb Rob Clark:
> > >>>> On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 12:11 AM Christian König
> > >>>> <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >>>>> Am 27.07.21 um 01:38 schrieb Rob Clark:
> > >>>>>> From: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Add a way to hint to the fence signaler of an upcoming deadline,
> > >>>>>> such as
> > >>>>>> vblank, which the fence waiter would prefer not to miss. This is to
> > >>>>>> aid
> > >>>>>> the fence signaler in making power management decisions, like boosting
> > >>>>>> frequency as the deadline approaches and awareness of missing
> > >>>>>> deadlines
> > >>>>>> so that can be factored in to the frequency scaling.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >>>>>> ---
> > >>>>>> drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c | 39
> > >>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >>>>>> include/linux/dma-fence.h | 17 ++++++++++++++++
> > >>>>>> 2 files changed, 56 insertions(+)
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
> > >>>>>> index ce0f5eff575d..2e0d25ab457e 100644
> > >>>>>> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
> > >>>>>> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c
> > >>>>>> @@ -910,6 +910,45 @@ dma_fence_wait_any_timeout(struct dma_fence
> > >>>>>> **fences, uint32_t count,
> > >>>>>> }
> > >>>>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_fence_wait_any_timeout);
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> +/**
> > >>>>>> + * dma_fence_set_deadline - set desired fence-wait deadline
> > >>>>>> + * @fence: the fence that is to be waited on
> > >>>>>> + * @deadline: the time by which the waiter hopes for the fence to be
> > >>>>>> + * signaled
> > >>>>>> + *
> > >>>>>> + * Inform the fence signaler of an upcoming deadline, such as
> > >>>>>> vblank, by
> > >>>>>> + * which point the waiter would prefer the fence to be signaled
> > >>>>>> by. This
> > >>>>>> + * is intended to give feedback to the fence signaler to aid in power
> > >>>>>> + * management decisions, such as boosting GPU frequency if a periodic
> > >>>>>> + * vblank deadline is approaching.
> > >>>>>> + */
> > >>>>>> +void dma_fence_set_deadline(struct dma_fence *fence, ktime_t
> > >>>>>> deadline)
> > >>>>>> +{
> > >>>>>> + unsigned long flags;
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> + if (dma_fence_is_signaled(fence))
> > >>>>>> + return;
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> + spin_lock_irqsave(fence->lock, flags);
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> + /* If we already have an earlier deadline, keep it: */
> > >>>>>> + if (test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_HAS_DEADLINE_BIT, &fence->flags) &&
> > >>>>>> + ktime_before(fence->deadline, deadline)) {
> > >>>>>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(fence->lock, flags);
> > >>>>>> + return;
> > >>>>>> + }
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> + fence->deadline = deadline;
> > >>>>>> + set_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_HAS_DEADLINE_BIT, &fence->flags);
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(fence->lock, flags);
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> + if (fence->ops->set_deadline)
> > >>>>>> + fence->ops->set_deadline(fence, deadline);
> > >>>>>> +}
> > >>>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(dma_fence_set_deadline);
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> /**
> > >>>>>> * dma_fence_init - Initialize a custom fence.
> > >>>>>> * @fence: the fence to initialize
> > >>>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-fence.h b/include/linux/dma-fence.h
> > >>>>>> index 6ffb4b2c6371..4e6cfe4e6fbc 100644
> > >>>>>> --- a/include/linux/dma-fence.h
> > >>>>>> +++ b/include/linux/dma-fence.h
> > >>>>>> @@ -88,6 +88,7 @@ struct dma_fence {
> > >>>>>> /* @timestamp replaced by @rcu on
> > >>>>>> dma_fence_release() */
> > >>>>>> struct rcu_head rcu;
> > >>>>>> };
> > >>>>>> + ktime_t deadline;
> > >>>>> Mhm, adding the flag sounds ok to me but I'm a bit hesitating adding
> > >>>>> the
> > >>>>> deadline as extra field here.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> We tuned the dma_fence structure intentionally so that it is only 64
> > >>>>> bytes.
> > >>>> Hmm, then I guess you wouldn't be a fan of also adding an hrtimer?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> We could push the ktime_t (and timer) down into the derived fence
> > >>>> class, but I think there is going to need to be some extra storage
> > >>>> *somewhere*.. maybe the fence signaler could get away with just
> > >>>> storing the nearest upcoming deadline per fence-context instead?
> > >>> I would just push that into the driver instead.
> > >>>
> > >>> You most likely don't want the deadline per fence anyway in complex
> > >>> scenarios, but rather per frame. And a frame is usually composed from
> > >>> multiple fences.
> > > Right, I ended up keeping track of the nearest deadline in patch 5/4
> > > which added drm/msm support:
> > >
> > > https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpatchwork.freedesktop.org%2Fpatch%2F447138%2F&data=04%7C01%7Cchristian.koenig%40amd.com%7Cce6ace85263d448bbc9f08d951d9f06c%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637630819606427306%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=ameszAOlClaZNeUDlYr37ZdIytVXNgiEUKuctjXLqZ0%3D&reserved=0
> > >
> > > But if we do have the ktime_t in dma_fence in dma_fence, we can add
> > > some checks and avoid calling back to the driver if a later deadline
> > > is set on a fence that already has an earlier deadline. OTOH I
> > > suppose I can push all that back to the driver to start, and we can
> > > revisit once we have more drivers implementing deadline support.
> >
> > I still think that all of this is rather specific to your use case and
> > have strong doubt that anybody else will implement that.
>
> i915 does already have a similar thing in it's hand-rolled atomic
> commit path. So I think msm won't be the only one. It should be also
> useful to the other mobile GPUs with a gpu vs kms driver split,
> although looking at the other gpu devfreq implementations, I don't
> think they've yet gotten to this point in the fine tuning..

Yeah I have a dream that maybe i915 will use the atomic commit helpers, I
originally wrote them with i915 in mind :-) even had patches!

I also think we'll need this eventually in other areas, Android also has
some hacks like this to make sure idle->first touch doesn't suck and
similar things.
-Daniel

>
> BR,
> -R
>
> > >> Thinking more about it we could probably kill the spinlock pointer and
> > >> make the flags 32bit if we absolutely need that here.
> > > If we had a 'struct dma_fence_context' we could push the spinlock, ops
> > > pointer, and u64 context into that and replace with a single
> > > dma_fence_context ptr, fwiw
> >
> > That won't work. We have a lot of use cases where you can't allocate
> > memory, but must allocate a context.
> >
> > Christian.
> >
> > >
> > > BR,
> > > -R
> > >
> > >> But I still don't see the need for that, especially since most drivers
> > >> probably won't implement it.
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >> Christian.
> > >>
> > >>> Regards,
> > >>> Christian.
> > >>>
> > >>>> BR,
> > >>>> -R
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Regards,
> > >>>>> Christian.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> u64 context;
> > >>>>>> u64 seqno;
> > >>>>>> unsigned long flags;
> > >>>>>> @@ -99,6 +100,7 @@ enum dma_fence_flag_bits {
> > >>>>>> DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT,
> > >>>>>> DMA_FENCE_FLAG_TIMESTAMP_BIT,
> > >>>>>> DMA_FENCE_FLAG_ENABLE_SIGNAL_BIT,
> > >>>>>> + DMA_FENCE_FLAG_HAS_DEADLINE_BIT,
> > >>>>>> DMA_FENCE_FLAG_USER_BITS, /* must always be last member */
> > >>>>>> };
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> @@ -261,6 +263,19 @@ struct dma_fence_ops {
> > >>>>>> */
> > >>>>>> void (*timeline_value_str)(struct dma_fence *fence,
> > >>>>>> char *str, int size);
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> + /**
> > >>>>>> + * @set_deadline:
> > >>>>>> + *
> > >>>>>> + * Callback to allow a fence waiter to inform the fence
> > >>>>>> signaler of an
> > >>>>>> + * upcoming deadline, such as vblank, by which point the
> > >>>>>> waiter would
> > >>>>>> + * prefer the fence to be signaled by. This is intended to
> > >>>>>> give feedback
> > >>>>>> + * to the fence signaler to aid in power management
> > >>>>>> decisions, such as
> > >>>>>> + * boosting GPU frequency.
> > >>>>>> + *
> > >>>>>> + * This callback is optional.
> > >>>>>> + */
> > >>>>>> + void (*set_deadline)(struct dma_fence *fence, ktime_t deadline);
> > >>>>>> };
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> void dma_fence_init(struct dma_fence *fence, const struct
> > >>>>>> dma_fence_ops *ops,
> > >>>>>> @@ -586,6 +601,8 @@ static inline signed long dma_fence_wait(struct
> > >>>>>> dma_fence *fence, bool intr)
> > >>>>>> return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
> > >>>>>> }
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> +void dma_fence_set_deadline(struct dma_fence *fence, ktime_t
> > >>>>>> deadline);
> > >>>>>> +
> > >>>>>> struct dma_fence *dma_fence_get_stub(void);
> > >>>>>> struct dma_fence *dma_fence_allocate_private_stub(void);
> > >>>>>> u64 dma_fence_context_alloc(unsigned num);
> >

--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch

Next message: Frank Wunderlich: "[PATCH v2] soc: mmsys: mediatek: add mask to mmsys routes"
Previous message: Daniel Vetter: "Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm: use the lookup lock in drm_is_current_master"
In reply to: Rob Clark: "Re: [RFC 1/4] dma-fence: Add deadline awareness"
Next in thread: Rob Clark: "Re: [RFC 1/4] dma-fence: Add deadline awareness"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]