Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: nvmem: qfprom: Add optional power-domains property

[Doug Anderson]

Hi,

On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 5:01 AM Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> qfprom devices on some SoCs need to vote on the performance state
> of a power-domain, so add the power-domains optional property to the
> bindings
>
> Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/qcom,qfprom.yaml | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/qcom,qfprom.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/qcom,qfprom.yaml
> index 861b205..a498a08 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/qcom,qfprom.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/qcom,qfprom.yaml
> @@ -51,6 +51,9 @@ properties:
>    vcc-supply:
>      description: Our power supply.
>
> +  power-domains:
> +    description: A phandle to a power domain node.
> +

I'm trying to channel my inner Rob here by saying that this
description doesn't add anything and this should just be:

power-domains:
  maxItems: 1

Here's an example of Rob saying this:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20210712151322.GA1931925@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

Other than that, feel free to add my "Reviewed-by" tag.

-Doug