Re: [PATCH 02/64] mac80211: Use flex-array for radiotap header bitmap

[Kees Cook]

On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 12:45:47PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 02:54:52PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 11:23:23AM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 10:35:56AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > > > @@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ ieee80211_add_rx_radiotap_header(struct ieee80211_local *local,
> > > >  			ieee80211_calculate_rx_timestamp(local, status,
> > > >  							 mpdulen, 0),
> > > >  			pos);
> > > > -		rthdr->it_present |= cpu_to_le32(1 << IEEE80211_RADIOTAP_TSFT);
> > > > +		rthdr->data.it_present |= cpu_to_le32(1 << IEEE80211_RADIOTAP_TSFT);
> > > 
> > > A drive-by comment, not related to the patchset, but rather the
> > > ieee80211 driver itself.
> > > 
> > > Shift expressions with (1 << NUMBER) can be subtly broken once the
> > > NUMBER is 31 and the value gets silently cast to a 64bit type. It will
> > > become 0xfffffffff80000000.
> > > 
> > > I've checked the IEEE80211_RADIOTAP_* defintions if this is even remotely
> > > possible and yes, IEEE80211_RADIOTAP_EXT == 31. Fortunatelly it seems to
> > > be used with used with a 32bit types (eg. _bitmap_shifter) so there are
> > > no surprises.
> > > 
> > > The recommended practice is to always use unsigned types for shifts, so
> > > "1U << ..." at least.
> > 
> > Ah, good catch! I think just using BIT() is the right replacement here,
> > yes? I suppose that should be a separate patch.
> 
> I found definition of BIT in vdso/bits.h, that does not sound like a
> standard header, besides that it shifts 1UL, that may not be necessary
> everywhere. IIRC there were objections against using the macro at all.

3945ff37d2f4 ("linux/bits.h: Extract common header for vDSO") moved it
there from linux/bits.h, and linux/bits.h now includes vdso/bits.h, so
it is still ever-present. :)

-- 
Kees Cook