回复: [PATCH] x86/intel_rdt: use __this_cpu_read in pseudo_lock_fn()

From: 苏辉(Robert Su)
Date: Fri Jul 30 2021 - 04:22:31 EST


Hi, Reinette:

There is no issue here, i just think it's better to use __this_cpu_read when
interrupt disabled.

________________________________________
发件人: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@xxxxxxxxx>
发送时间: 2021年7月28日 2:56
收件人: 苏辉(Robert Su); fenghua.yu@xxxxxxxxx; tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; mingo@xxxxxxxxxx; bp@xxxxxxxxx; x86@xxxxxxxxxx; hpa@xxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
主题: Re: [PATCH] x86/intel_rdt: use __this_cpu_read in pseudo_lock_fn()

Hi,

On 7/22/2021 7:33 PM, Hui Su wrote:
> The code is executed with interrupts disabled,
> so it's safe to use __this_cpu_read().

True ... but could you please elaborate what the issue is with using
this_cpu_read()? It too is safe to use when interrupts are disabled.

>
> Signed-off-by: Hui Su <suhui@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/pseudo_lock.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/pseudo_lock.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/pseudo_lock.c
> index 2207916cae65..f0cc0a89333b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/pseudo_lock.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/pseudo_lock.c
> @@ -464,8 +464,8 @@ static int pseudo_lock_fn(void *_rdtgrp)
> * cache.
> */
> __wrmsr(MSR_MISC_FEATURE_CONTROL, prefetch_disable_bits, 0x0);
> - closid_p = this_cpu_read(pqr_state.cur_closid);
> - rmid_p = this_cpu_read(pqr_state.cur_rmid);
> + closid_p = __this_cpu_read(pqr_state.cur_closid);
> + rmid_p = __this_cpu_read(pqr_state.cur_rmid);
> mem_r = plr->kmem;
> size = plr->size;
> line_size = plr->line_size;
>

Reinette